Surjective capacity and splitting capacity (Q2324648)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Surjective capacity and splitting capacity
scientific article

    Statements

    Surjective capacity and splitting capacity (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    11 September 2019
    0 references
    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. We denote by \(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) the set of all prime ideals of \(R\) and \(j\)-\(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) the set of all prime ideals in \(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) that can be written as the intersection of maximal ideals. \(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) is called the \emph{spectrum} and \(j\)-\(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) the \emph{\(j\)-spectrum} of \(R.\) Let \(N\) be an \(R\)-module. The \emph{support} of \(N,\) denoted by \(\mathrm{Supp}_R(N),\) is the set of all \(\mathfrak{p} \in\) \(\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) such that \(N_\mathfrak{p}\neq 0.\) In the present paper, the author prove the following results: \begin{itemize} \item[1.] Let \(R\) be a commutative Noetherian ring and \(S\) a possibly noncommutative module-finite \(R\)-algebra. Let \(M\) and \(N\) be finitely generated right \(S\)-modules. Suppose that \(X=j-\mathrm{Spec}(R)\cap \hbox{Supp}_R(N),\) has finite dimension. \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] If \(M_\mathfrak{p}\) maps onto \(N_\mathfrak{p}^{\oplus[t+\dim_X(\mathfrak{p})]}\) for every \(\mathfrak{p}\in X,\) then \(M\) maps onto \(N^{\oplus t}\) \item[(ii)] If \(M_\mathfrak{p}\) admits \(N_\mathfrak{p}^{\oplus[t+\dim_X(\mathfrak{p})]}\) as a direct summand for every \(\mathfrak{p}\in X,\) then \(M\) admits \(N^{\oplus t}\) as a direct summand. \end{itemize} \item[2.] Let \(R\) be a commutative ring and \(S\) a possibly noncommutative module-finite \(R\)-algebra. Let \(M\) be a direct summand of a direct sum of finitely presented right \(S\)-modules, and let \(N\) be a right \(S\)-module. Suppose that \(Y=\mathrm{Max}(R)\cap\hbox{Supp}_R(N),\) is Noetherian of finite dimension \(d.\) \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] Suppose that \(N\) is finitely generated over \(S\). If \(M_\mathfrak{m}\) maps onto \(N_\mathfrak{m}^{\oplus(t+d)}\) for every \(\mathfrak{m}\in Y\), then \(M\) maps onto \(N^{\oplus t}\) \item[(ii)] Suppose that \(N\) is finitely presented over \(S\). If \(M_\mathfrak{m}\) admits \(N_\mathfrak{m}^{\oplus(t+d)}\) as a direct summand for every \(\mathfrak{m}\in Y\), then \(M\) admits \(N^{\oplus t}\) as a direct summand. \end{itemize} \end{itemize}
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    basic element
    0 references
    basic set
    0 references
    split
    0 references
    summand
    0 references
    surjective
    0 references
    test point
    0 references
    0 references