Residue field domination in real closed valued fields (Q2330500)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Residue field domination in real closed valued fields
scientific article

    Statements

    Residue field domination in real closed valued fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 October 2019
    0 references
    The present article explores analogues, in the context of real closed valued fields (\(\mathrm{RCVF}\)), of stable domination results proven by \textit{D. Haskell} et al. [Stable domination and independence in algebraically closed valued fields. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2011; Zbl 1217.03026)]. In a nutshell, the authors show how in \(\mathrm{RCVF}\) the residue field plays a similar domination role as in algebraically closed valued fields (\(\mathrm{ACVF}\)), despite behaving very differently from a model-theoretic perspective. Indeed, in \(\mathrm{ACVF}\) the residue field is stable and encodes essentially the stable part of the structure, while in \(\mathrm{RCVF}\), the residue field is a real closed field having thus no stable-like behaviour at all. Let us briefly recall what domination means. Following their Definition 1.7, given collections of rosy sorts \(\mathcal{S}\) and \(\mathcal{T}\) (i.e., admitting a certain notion of independence) and subsets of parameters \(C\subseteq A\), one says that the type \(\mathrm{tp}(A/C)\) is \textit{dominated by \(\mathcal{S}\)} if for any \(B\supseteq C\) such that \(\mathcal{S}(B)\) is independent of \(\mathcal{S}(A)\) over \(\mathcal{S}(C)\), the type \(\mathrm{tp}(A/CB)\) is implied by \(\mathrm{tp}(A/C\mathcal{S}(B))\). Similarly, one says that \(\mathrm{tp}(A/C)\) is \textit{dominated by \(\mathcal{S}\) over \(\mathcal{T}\)} if \(\mathrm{tp}(A/C\mathcal{T}(A))\) is dominated by \(\mathcal{S}\). Having this definition at hand, two of their main results can be summarized as follows: Let \(C\subseteq M\) be substructures of a sufficiently large real closed valued field \(\mathcal{R}\) with \(C\) maximal (as a valued field). Then, \begin{itemize} \item[1.] if the residue field extension \(k_C\subseteq k_M\) is regular and the quotient of value groups \(\Gamma_M/\Gamma_C\) is torsion-free, then \(\mathrm{tp}(M/C)\) is dominated by the value group and the residue field (Corollary 2.6); \item[2.] the type \(\mathrm{tp}(M/C)\) is dominated over the value group by the sorts which are internal to the residue field (Corollary 2.10). \end{itemize} They show moreover that the previous results hold as well for \(\mathrm{RCVF}\) extended by the so-called geometric sorts (Theorem 4.6) and provide a variant in terms of forking, namely, they show that, over a maximal base, forking and thorn-forking are determined by the value group and residue field (Theorem 3.4). Although several lemmas and preliminary results hold in the more general context of \(T\)-convex structures as defined in [\textit{A. H. Lewenberg} and \textit{L. van den Dries}, J. Symb. Log. 60, No. 1, 74--102 (1995, Zbl 0856.03028)], their domination results currently hold only for \(\mathrm{RCVF}\). They left as an open question for future work whether domination can be extended to this context.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    valued fields
    0 references
    ordered fields
    0 references
    stable domination
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references