Non-projected Calabi-Yau supermanifolds over \(\mathbb{P}^2\) (Q2331779)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Non-projected Calabi-Yau supermanifolds over \(\mathbb{P}^2\) |
scientific article |
Statements
Non-projected Calabi-Yau supermanifolds over \(\mathbb{P}^2\) (English)
0 references
30 October 2019
0 references
This paper is concerned with the obstruction of supermanifolds to be projected, concentrating on supermanifolds of a complex projective space \(\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{C}}^{n}\) as the associated reduced manifold and seeking to find the most general conditions for such supermanifolds to be non-projected. It is shown that only varieties of bosonic dimension \(1\) and \(2\) admit non-projected structures. The authors succeed in classifying non-projected supermanifolds over \(\mathbb{P}^{1}\) of odd dimension \(2\). They provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the supermanifold over \(\mathbb{P}^{2}\) to be non-projected. What is indeed remarkable, these supermanifolds turn out to be nothing but Calabi-Yau supermanifolds [\textit{S. Noja} et al., J. High Energy Phys. 2017, No. 4, Paper No. 94, 43 p. (2017; Zbl 1378.83088)]. It is established that these supermanifolds are not embeddable into a split projective superspace. The authors hold that the role of embedding spaces in supergeometry has to be played by super Grassmannians, establishing that all of non-projected supermanifolds over \(\mathbb{P} ^{2}\) are embeddable into a certain super Grassmannian (Theorem 6.1). The authors then investigate the supermanifolds corresponding to two distinct choices of the fermionic sheaf \(\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{M}}\), namely, \begin{itemize} \item the case when \(\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{M}}\) is the decomposable sheaf \[ \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}\left( -1\right) \oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}\left( -2\right) \] \item the non-decomposable case when is the cotangent bundle \(\Omega_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}^{1}\) of \(\mathbb{P}^{2}\). \end{itemize} In the decomposable case, it is shown that it is neither projective nor \(\Pi \)-projective. In the non-decomposable case, it is demonstrated that it coincides with the \(\Pi\)-projective plane \(\mathbb{P}_{\Pi}^{2}\) introduced by \textit{Yu. I. Manin} [Gauge fields and complex geometry. (Kalibrovochnye polya i kompleksnaya geometriya) (Russian). Moskva: ''Nauka'' (1984; Zbl 0576.53002); Prog. Phys. 5, 231--234 (1982; Zbl 0535.70018)] in a completely different way. It is established that this unexpected correspondence is only a particular case of a general fact [\textit{S. Noja}, J. Geom. Phys. 124, 286--299 (2018; Zbl 1388.58004)], meaning that \(\Pi\)-projective geometry arises naturally as one considers the cotangent bundle of projective spaces as the fermionic bundle over \(\mathbb{P}^{n}\).
0 references
bosonic dimension
0 references
supergeometry
0 references
super Grassmannians
0 references
fermionic sheaf
0 references
\(\Pi\)-projective geometry
0 references