Periods of residual automorphic forms (Q2338940)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Periods of residual automorphic forms
scientific article

    Statements

    Periods of residual automorphic forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 March 2015
    0 references
    A representation of a reductive connected group \(G\) is said to be distinguished by a subgroup \(H\) if it admits a nonzero \(H\)-invariant linear form. Distinguished representations are expected to be those representations of \(G\) which are obtained as functorial lift from a third group \(G'\). This concept makes sense for representations of real or \(p\)-adic groups as well as automorphic representations where the requirement on a nonzero invariant linear form is replaced by the nonvanishing of the \(H\)-period \(\int_{H(F)\backslash H(\mathbb A)}\varphi(h)\,dh\), when \(\varphi\) is a cusp form. This paper deals with a generalization to noncuspidal automorphic forms and representations having no Whittaker model. When \(\varphi\) is not cuspidal, the period integral will be divergent. However, one can still construct a natural regularization of the divergent \(H\)-period integral, called regularized period, in various cases. The regularization is based on a relative variant of Arthur's truncation operator, called mixed truncation and denoted by \(\Lambda^T_m\). The mixed truncation enjoys many good properties. Its upshot is a rapidly decreasing function on \(H(F)\backslash H(\mathbb A)^1\). This paper applies this machinery to the case of the twisted tensor, or Asai, \(L\)-function, where \(G = R_{E/F}\mathrm{GL}(n)\) and \(H = \mathrm{GL}(n)/F\), and \(E/F\) is a quadratic extension of number fields. The distinction in this case has been extensively studied both locally and globally. In this case the group \(G'\) is conjectured to be a quasisplit unitary group of \(n\) variables by the reviewer's work: [J. Reine Angew. Math. 418, 139--172 (1991; Zbl 0725.11026)]. In particular the paper shows: Let \(\sigma\) be an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation of \(\mathrm{GL}(r,A_E)\). Then the residual representation \(\mathrm{Sp}(\sigma,d)\) is distinguished by \(\mathrm{GL}(dr,\mathbb A)\) if and only if \(\sigma\) is distinguished by \(\mathrm{GL}(r,\mathbb A)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    Rankin-Selberg methods
    0 references
    periods of automorphic forms
    0 references
    distinguished representations
    0 references
    Asai \(L\)-functions
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references