Positive quandle homology and its applications in knot theory (Q2346728)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positive quandle homology and its applications in knot theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Positive quandle homology and its applications in knot theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 June 2015
    0 references
    A quandle is a set \(Q\) together with a binary operation \(*:Q\times Q\to Q\) satisfying \(x* x=x\), \((x* y)* z=(x* z)* (y* z)\) (for all \(x,y,z\in Q\)), and \(-* x:Q\to Q\) bijective for all \(x\in Q\). The canonical example is a group \(G\) with operation \(x*y=y^{-1}xy\). One of the most interesting points is that quandles can be used for knot coloring. A powerful knot invariant induced by a (finite) quandle is the so called state-sum invariant, that essentialy makes an average of a weight given by a ``2-cocycle'', over all crossings and all possible colorings, so it is very interesting to know non-trivial 2-cocycles. The way to produce cocycles is well known (see for instance [\textit{J. S. Carter} et al., Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 355, No. 10, 3947--3989 (2003; Zbl 1028.57003)]): given a quandle, a cohomology theory is defined, and its differential is given by a difference of two differentials. More precisely, for \(n\in\mathbb N\) consider the free abelian group with generators \(Q^n\), and \(d_1,d_2\) the maps given by \[ d_1(q_1,\dots,q_n)=\sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^i (q_1,\dots,q_{i-1},\widehat{q_i},\dots,,q_n), \] \[ d_2(q_1,\dots,q_n)=\sum_{i=1}^n(-1)^i (q_1*q_i,\dots,q_{i-1}*q_i,\widehat{q_i},\dots,,q_n) \] Then \(\partial:=d_1-d_2\) happens to be a differential, and the (rack) cohomology with coefficients in an abelian group \(A\) is defined as the cohomology of \(\partial^*:A^{Q^*}\to A^{Q^{*+1}}\) \[ \begin{multlined} \partial^*(f)(q_1,\dots,q_{n+1}) = \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} (-1)^i f(q_1,\dots,q_{i-1},\widehat{q_i},\dots,q_{n+1})\\ - \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} (-1)^i f(q_1*q_i,\dots,q_{i-1}*q_i,\widehat{q_i},\dots,q_{n+1}).\end{multlined} \] The quandle cohomology is defined in a similar way, considering the subcomplex generated by maps \(f:Q^n\to A\) vanishing on elements of type \((q_1,\dots,q_{i-1},q,q,q_{i+1},\dots,q_n)\), these cocycles are the ones that preserve Reidemeister moves, so they can be used to compute state-sum invariants. Also, given a quandle \(Q\) and an abelian group together with an automorphism \(T\), in [\textit{J. S. Carter} et al., Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2, 95--135 (2002; Zbl 0991.57005)] a twisted version is defined, considering the differential \[ \begin{multlined} \partial^*(f)(q_1,\dots,q_{n+1})= \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} (-1)^i T(f(q_1,\dots,q_{i-1},\widehat{q_i},\dots,q_{n+1})) \\ - \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} (-1)^i f(q_1*q_i,\dots,q_{i-1}*q_i,\widehat{q_i},\dots,q_{n+1}).\end{multlined} \] In the paper under review, the authors consider positive and negative cohomology as the cohomology corresponding to the differentials \(\partial_{\pm}:=d_1\pm d_2\), the negative cohomology being the usual cohomology, and the positive cohomology a new one. It is quite surprising that the authors do not notice that positive cohomology is the same as twisted cohomology, simply choosing \(T=-\mathrm{Id}\), the differential is the same up to a global sign, that of course does not change cohomology. The proofs of the standard facts such as \(\partial_\pm^2=0\), well-definedness of the subcomplex giving quandle cohomology, or the state-sum procedure in order to obtain knot invariants with \(H^2\) becomes unnecessary since they were already proven in [Zbl 0991.57005] for the general twisted version. We notice that also the twisted cohomology is a particular case of taking coefficients in \(G_Q\)-modules, where \(G_Q\) is the group freely generated by \(Q\) with the relations \(x*y=y^{-1}xy\), which is also a particular case of cohomology with coefficients in \(\mathbb Z(Q)\)-modules, where the algebra \(\mathbb Z(Q)\) (and the corresponding generalized (co)homology) was defined by \textit{N. Andruskiewitsch} and \textit{M. Graña} [Adv. Math. 178, No. 2, 177--243 (2003; Zbl 1032.16028)]; the algebra \(\mathbb Z(Q)\) admits a cannonical epimorphism \(\mathbb Z(Q)\to \mathbb Z[G_Q]\), so every \(\mathbb Z(Q)\)-module is a \(G_Q\)-module. The genuine new results of the paper under review are computations of twisted cohomology for two examples. First, the trivial quandle of two elements: \(T_2\). It is well-known that, for a non trivial 2-cocycle, \(T_2\) gives the linking number, so for example it does not ``see'' the Borromean rings. In this paper a particular twisted 2-cocycle is presented that detects the nontriviality of the Borromean rings. The second example is the dihedral quandle \(D_3\): the set of reflections of the dihedral group. It is well-known that the usual (that is with trivial coeficients) cohomology vanishes in degree 2, but it is shown that twisted 2-cohomology is not trivial, so one can use it to compute non trivial knot invariants, the authors also give an interpretation of this invariant in terms of trivially 3-colored crossing points.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    quandle cohomology
    0 references
    knot invariants
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references