Möbius convolutions and the Riemann hypothesis (Q2368483)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Möbius convolutions and the Riemann hypothesis
scientific article

    Statements

    Möbius convolutions and the Riemann hypothesis (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    19 April 2006
    0 references
    \textit{M. Riesz} [Acta Math. 40, 185--190 (1916; JFM 46.0497.03)] proved that the Riemann hypothesis RH is equivalent to the estimate \[ \sum_{n=1}^\infty {{(-1)^{n+1} x^n}\over {(n-1)! \; \zeta(2n)}} \ll x^{{1\over 4}+\epsilon}, \hbox{ as } x\to\infty. \] In [Acta Math. 41, 119--196 (1917; JFM 46.0498.01)], there is a modification of this result due to \textit{G. H. Hardy} and \textit{J. E. Littlewood}. The author's aim is to embed these results into a general theorem for a class of entire functions. The Mellin transform of a complex--valued function \(f\) is \[ f^\wedge(s) = \int_0^\infty t^{-s-1} f(t) dt, \] when the integral converges absolutely. Define for real \(a\) the norm \(N_a(f) = \int_0^\infty t^{-a-1} | f(t) | dt\). The function \(\Phi\) is \textit{proper}, if \(N_\sigma (\Phi) < \infty\) at least for \( -{1\over 2} < \sigma \leq 0\), and it is \textit{Mellin--proper}, if \(\Phi\) is proper and \(\Phi^\wedge(s) \not=0 \) in \(-{1\over 2} < \sigma < 0\). Using the sum--function \(\displaystyle g(x) = \sum_{n\leq x} {1\over n} \cdot \mu(n)\) with the Möbius--function \(\mu\), the convolution operator \textbf{G}\ is defined by \[ \hbox{{\mathbf G}}\Phi(x) = \int_0^\infty g(xt) \Phi\left({1\over t} \right) {{dt} \over t}. \] The author proves: If \(\Phi\) is Mellin--proper, then RH is equivalent with the condition \textbf{G}\(\Phi(x) \ll x^{-{1\over 2} + \epsilon}, \) and the ``entire function RH--criterion'': For an entire, Mellin--proper function \(\Phi(z) = a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + \dots\) with the associated entire function \(\displaystyle \Phi^\ast(z) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty {{a_n z^n} \over {n \zeta(n+1)}}\; \) the equivalence \[ \hbox{RH} \iff \Phi^\ast(x) \ll x^{- {1\over 2} + \epsilon} \] is true. Concerning the Riemann hypothesis with only simple zeros (RHS), the author proves, that the relation \textbf{G}\(\Phi(x) \ll x^{-{1\over 2}}\), as \(x\to\infty\), implies RHS, if \(\Phi\) is Mellin--proper and if \(\Phi^\wedge\) [holomorphic in the strip \(-{1\over 2} < \sigma < 0\) and continuous on \(-{1\over 2} \leq \sigma \leq 0\)] does not vanish on the line \(\sigma = - {1\over 2}\). Finally the author shows that \textbf{G}\(\Phi(x) \not= o\left(x^{-{1\over 2}}\right)\), if \(\Phi\) is Mellin--proper, and --- if \(\Phi\) is real--valued in addition --- there is a \(\beta, \, 0 \leq \beta < {1\over 2}\) so that \[ \liminf_{x\to\infty} x^{\beta + \epsilon}\hbox{{\mathbf G}} \Phi(x) = - \infty, \quad \limsup_{x\to\infty} x^{\beta + \epsilon}\hbox{{\mathbf G}} \Phi(x) = \infty \] for all \(\epsilon > 0\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Riemann hypothesis
    0 references
    Mellin transform
    0 references
    simple zeros of the Riemann zeta function
    0 references
    estimates of Mellin transforms equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis
    0 references
    0 references