On orders and vanishing of integral cohomology groups. (Q2370230)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On orders and vanishing of integral cohomology groups.
scientific article

    Statements

    On orders and vanishing of integral cohomology groups. (English)
    0 references
    22 June 2007
    0 references
    In this paper it is shown Theorem A. If \(G\) is a finite group with a normal subgroup \(N\) such that \(G/N\) is cyclic then no two consecutive integral cohomology groups \(H^i(G,\mathbb{Z})\), \(H^{i+1}(G,\mathbb{Z})\) can vanish. The author deduces this elegant result from a recurrence relation involving the orders of the integral cohomology groups \(H^n(G,\mathbb{Z})\), \(n\geq 1\), when \(G\) has a non-trivial cyclic factor group. To obtain this recurrence relation some exact sequences constructed by \textit{G. Lewis} [in Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 132, 501-529 (1968; Zbl 0217.34903)] are used. Using Theorem A, it is then shown that if \(\kappa\) is a field of characteristic \(p\) and \(G\) a finite group with \(H^1(G,\kappa)\neq 0\), (i.e., \(G\) has a normal subgroup of index \(p\)) then \(H^{2n}(G,\kappa )\neq 0\) for all \(n\geq 0\). This answers Problem 7.2 of \textit{D. J. Benson} [in Comments and corrections for the books and papers of Dave Benson, followed by a collection of problems, \texttt{http://www.math.uga.edu/archive/benson.html} (2005)]. Note that if \(G\) is a finite \(p\)-group then it has been shown by \textit{T.-N. Kuo} [J. Algebra 7, 160-167 (1967; Zbl 0189.32402)] that \(\widehat H^{2n}(G,\mathbb{Z})\neq 0\) for every \(n\).
    0 references
    0 references
    finite groups
    0 references
    recurrence relations
    0 references
    orders of integral cohomology groups
    0 references
    exact sequences
    0 references
    0 references