Rationality of motivic zeta functions for curves with finite abelian group actions (Q2376579)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Rationality of motivic zeta functions for curves with finite abelian group actions
    scientific article

      Statements

      Rationality of motivic zeta functions for curves with finite abelian group actions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      24 June 2013
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a variety over a finite field \(\mathbb{F}\) and let \(\text{Sym}^n(X)\) be the \(n\)th symmetric power of \(X\). A famous result by \textit{B. Dwork} [Am. J. Math. 82, 631--648 (1960; Zbl 0173.48501)] states that the zeta-function \[ Z_X(t)= \sum_i |\text{Sym}^n(X)| t^n \] is a rational function on \(t\). If \(k\) is any field one can consider the Grothendieck ring \(A(k)= K_0({\mathcal V}_k)\) for varieties over \(k\), i. e., the ring of \(\mathbb{Z}\)-combinations of isomorphism classes of \(k\)-varieties modulo the relations \[ [X]=[Y]+ [X-Y] \] for closed varieties \(Y\subset X\). Then the motivic zeta function is defined, as a power series in the ring \(A(k)\), by \[ \zeta_X(t)= \sum_i [\text{Sym}^n(X)] t^n.\tag{1} \] By a result of \textit{M. Kapranov} [``The elliptic curve in the S-duality theory and Eisenstein series for Kac-Moody groups'', \url{arXiv:math/0001005}], if \(X\) is a curve then the function in (1) is rational, while the same statement is false for higher-dimensional varieties. The aim of this paper is to prove the rationality of motivic zeta functions for curves with a finite abelian group action. Let \(G\) be a fixed algebraic group and let \({\mathcal V}^G_k\) be the category of varieties with \(G\)-actions. An object in \({\mathcal V}^G_k\) is a pair \((V,\sigma)\), with \(X\in{\mathcal V}_k\) and \(\sigma: G\times X\to X\) an algebraic group action of \(G\) on \(X\). The Grothendieck group \(K_0({\mathcal V}_k)\) is the free abelian group on isomorphism classes in \({\mathcal V}^G_k\)1 modulo the relations \[ [X,\sigma]= [Y,\tau]+ [X- Y,\sigma], \] where \((Y,\tau)\) is a closed \(G\)-invariant subspace of \((X, \sigma)\). Multiplication in \(K_0({\mathcal V}^G_k)\) is defined by \[ [X,\sigma] [Y,\tau]= [X\times Y,\,\sigma\times\tau], \] where \(\sigma\times\tau: G\times X\times Y\to X\times Y\) is defined by \((\sigma\times\tau)(g,x,y)= (\sigma(g,x), \tau(g,y))\). Let \(A(k,G)\) be the Grothendieck ring obtained in such a way. Then the author proves the following: Theorem 1. Let \(G\) be finite abelian group of order \(m\) and let \(C\) be a non-singular projective curve over an algebraically closed field \(k\) of characteristic \(p\), with \(p\) not dividing \(m\). Let \(\sigma: G\times C\times C\) be a group action on \(C\). Then the motivic zeta function \[ \zeta_{(C,\sigma)}= \sum_i [\text{Sym}^n(C,\sigma)] t^n \] is rational, as a power series in the ring \(A(k,G)\).
      0 references
      Grothendieck ring for varieties with group actions
      0 references
      motivic zeta-functions
      0 references
      \(K\)-theory
      0 references
      Picard bundle
      0 references
      equivariant bundles
      0 references
      Weil conjectures
      0 references
      invariant theory
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references