Minimizing differences of convex functions with applications to facility location and clustering (Q2401517)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Minimizing differences of convex functions with applications to facility location and clustering
scientific article

    Statements

    Minimizing differences of convex functions with applications to facility location and clustering (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 September 2017
    0 references
    The authors consider the weighted Fermat-Torricelli problem, that is, the problem of minimizing an averaged sum of distances to a finite number of points in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\), with both positive and negative weights. The distance involved does not need to be a genuine distance as, rather than being induced by a norm, it is actually generated by the Minkowski gauge of a compact convex set containing the origin in its interior. The presence of negative weights makes the problem nonconvex; more specifically, the objective function is DC (that is, a difference of convex functions). To solve the problem, following an approach initiated by \textit{Le Thi Hoai An} et al. [J. Glob. Optim. 37, No. 4, 593--608 (2007; Zbl 1198.90327)] for clustering problems, the authors develop numerical methods based on the difference of convex functions algorithm (DCA) due to \textit{Pham Dinh Tao} and \textit{S. El Bernoussi} [in: Fermat days 85: Mathematics for optimization, Toulouse/France 1985, North-Holland Math. Stud. 129, 249--271 (1986; Zbl 0638.90087)], which they combine with the \textit{Yu. Nesterov} smoothing technique [Math. Program. 103, No. 1 (A), 127--152 (2005; Zbl 1079.90102)]. They also propose the DCA to solve a set clustering problem, consisting in finding the points \(x^{1},\dots,x^{k}\in \mathbb{R}^{n}\) that minimize \( \sum\limits_{i=1}^{m}\min_{i=1,\dots,l}[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2},\) the sets \( \Omega ^{i}\subset \mathbb{R}^{n}\) being nonempty, convex and closed and \(d\) denoting the Euclidean distance;\ the DC decomposition considered for this objective function is based on the equality \(\min_{i=1,...,l}[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2}=\sum\limits_{l=1}^{k}[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2}-\max_{r=1,\dots,k}\sum\limits_{l=1,l\neq r}^{k}[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2}\), with \(\sum\limits_{l=1}^{k}[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2}\) being further decomposed as \(\sum\limits_{l=1}^{k}\left\| x^{l}\right\| ^{2}-\sum\limits_{l=1}^{k}\varphi _{\Omega ^{i}}(x^{l})\); as proved in the paper, the functions \(\varphi _{\Omega ^{i}}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) defined by \(\varphi _{\Omega ^{i}}(x):=\left\| x\right\| ^{2}-[d(x^{l};\Omega ^{i})]^{2}\) are convex and differentiable. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the proposed algorithms. Another recent DC approach to facility location can be found in [\textit{A. Wagner} et al., J. Convex Anal. 23, No. 4, 1185--1204 (2016; Zbl 1354.49077)].
    0 references
    difference of convex functions
    0 references
    multifacility location
    0 references
    set clustering
    0 references
    Fermat-Torricelli problem
    0 references
    Nesterov smoothing technique
    0 references
    DCA
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references