Heegaard Floer homology of Matsumoto's manifolds (Q2411334)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Heegaard Floer homology of Matsumoto's manifolds
scientific article

    Statements

    Heegaard Floer homology of Matsumoto's manifolds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    20 October 2017
    0 references
    For a knot \(K\) in \(S^3\) let \(\Sigma_2(K)\) denote the double branched cover. \textit{P. Lisca} [Geom. Topol. 11, 429--472 (2007; Zbl 1185.57006)] proved that if \(K\) is a 2-bridge knot, then \(K\) is slice if and only if \(\Sigma_2(K)\) bounds a rational homology \(4\)-ball. In this paper the author shows that this is in general not true for twisted Whitehead doubles. More precisely, it is shown that the \(12\)-twisted Whitehead double of the torus knot \(K_{2,7}\) and the \(20\)-twisted Whitehead double of the torus knot \(K_{3,7}\) are both not slice but their double branched covers bound rational homology \(4\)-balls. Let \(M_n(K _1,K_2)\) be the homology 3-sphere presented by knots \(K_1\), and \(K_2\) with geometric linking number one and framings \(0\) and \(n\) respectively. The author calls these homology spheres Matsumoto's manifolds. When \(K_1=T_{2,3}\), then \(M_n(T_{2,3},K)\) is obtained by 1-surgery on the \(n\)-twisted Whitehead double of \(K\). Using a computation of Ozsváth--Szabó's \(\tau\)-invariant for twisted Whitehead doubles from [\textit{M. Hedden}, Geom. Topol. 11, 2277--2338 (2007; Zbl 1187.57015)] and calculating the Heegaard Floer homology of \(M_n(T_{2,3},K)\), the author shows that \(M_n(T_{2,3},K)\) bounds no contractible \(4\)-manifold if \(n<2\tau(K)\). In particular, the \(n\)-twisted Whitehead double of \(K\) is not slice.
    0 references
    homology spheres
    0 references
    Whitehead double
    0 references
    contractible 4-manifold
    0 references
    slice knot
    0 references
    rational 4-ball
    0 references
    double branched cover
    0 references

    Identifiers