Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes (Q2430684)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5876209
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5876209

      Statements

      Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      8 April 2011
      0 references
      Best and Brouwer (1977) used linear programming to show that shortening any 1-perfect binary code \(i\) times with \(1 \leq i \leq 3\) yields an optimal \((2^m-1-i, 2^{2^m -m-1-i}, 3)\) code. It has been left open whether all optimal codes with these parameters can be obtained from this way up to equivalence. Etzion and Vardy (1994) asked this question and Blackmore (1999) gave an affirmative answer to the question for \(i=1\). The paper under review gives a negative answer for \(i=2\) by constructing two \((13, 512, 3)\) codes which are not doubly shortened perfect codes.
      0 references
      0 references
      Hamming code
      0 references
      perfect code
      0 references
      shortening
      0 references

      Identifiers