Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes (Q2430684)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5876209
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5876209 |
Statements
Two optimal one-error-correcting codes of length 13 that are not doubly shortened perfect codes (English)
0 references
8 April 2011
0 references
Best and Brouwer (1977) used linear programming to show that shortening any 1-perfect binary code \(i\) times with \(1 \leq i \leq 3\) yields an optimal \((2^m-1-i, 2^{2^m -m-1-i}, 3)\) code. It has been left open whether all optimal codes with these parameters can be obtained from this way up to equivalence. Etzion and Vardy (1994) asked this question and Blackmore (1999) gave an affirmative answer to the question for \(i=1\). The paper under review gives a negative answer for \(i=2\) by constructing two \((13, 512, 3)\) codes which are not doubly shortened perfect codes.
0 references
Hamming code
0 references
perfect code
0 references
shortening
0 references
0 references
0.7930306196212769
0 references
0.7773734331130981
0 references