(Sub)fit biframes and non-symmetric nearness. (Q2447130)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | (Sub)fit biframes and non-symmetric nearness. |
scientific article |
Statements
(Sub)fit biframes and non-symmetric nearness. (English)
0 references
24 April 2014
0 references
Nearnesses in pointfree topology are admitted precisely by regular frames. The initial approach to the concept of nearness in frames was via systems of covers, called uniform covers. This naturally made everything symmetric. The authors of the present paper discuss a non-symmetric variant via Weil entourages that were introduced to pointfree topology by the first-named author. Included in their tool kit are techniques from biframes. Starting by describing a subbilocale of a biframe, and observing that each subbilocale of a biframe is a biframe, they show that (i) a subbilocale of a fit biframe is subfit, and (ii) a biframe is fit if and only if each of its subbilocales is subfit. Whereas, as already mentioned, only regular frames can admit a nearness, the authors prove that a biframe admits a quasi-nearness precisely when it is subfit. Analogously with this result, they establish that a frame admits a quasi-nearness if and only if it is the total part of a subfit biframe.
0 references
frames
0 references
biframes
0 references
locales
0 references
sublocale lattices
0 references
fitness
0 references
subfitness
0 references
pair-covers
0 references
entourages
0 references
nearness
0 references
quasi-nearness
0 references