Cyclic permutations realized by signed shifts (Q2448249)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Cyclic permutations realized by signed shifts
scientific article

    Statements

    Cyclic permutations realized by signed shifts (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 April 2014
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a linearly ordered set, \(f:X\to X\) be a map and \(n\) be a non-negative integer. If there are no repetitions among the first \(n\) elements of the sequence \(\{f^i(x)\}_{i\geqslant0}\) then the pattern of length \(n\) of \(f\) at \(x\) is \(\text{Pat}(x,f,n)=\text{st}(x,f(x),\ldots,f^{n-1}(x))\), where st is the reduction operation that outputs the permutation of \([n] =\{1, 2, \dots , n\}\) whose entries are in the same relative order as \(n\) entries in the input. An element \(x\in X\) is an \(n\)-periodic point of \(f\) if \(f^n(x)=x\) but \(f^i(x)\neq x\) for \(1\leqslant i<n\). If \(x\) is an \(n\)-periodic point, the permutation \(\text{Pat}(x, f, n)\) is denoted by \(\Pi(x, f)\) and is called the periodic pattern of \(f\) at \(x\). Let \(\mathcal{P}_n(f) = \{\Pi(x, f) : x \in X~ \text{is an } n\text{-periodic point of}~ f\}\) and \(\mathcal{P}(f)=\bigcup_{n\geqslant0}\mathcal{P}_n(f)\). Moreover, let \(p_n(f)=\frac{|\mathcal{P}_n(f)|}{n}\). Let \(k\geqslant2\) be fixed, and let \(\mathcal{W}_k\) be the set of infinite words \(s = s_1s_2\ldots\) over the alphabet \(\{0, 1, \ldots , k-1\}\). Let \({}<_{\text{lex}}\) denote the lexicographic order on these words. Put \(\bar{s_i}=k-1-s_i\). Fix \(\sigma = \sigma_0\sigma_1\ldots \sigma_{k-1}\in\{+,-\}^k\). Let \(T^+_\sigma = \{t : \sigma_t = +\}\), \(T^-_\sigma = \{t : \sigma_t = -\}\) and define \(\Sigma'_\sigma:(\mathcal{W}_k,{}<_{\text{lex}})\to(\mathcal{W}_k,{}<_{\text{lex}})\) by \(\Sigma'_\sigma(s_1s_2s_3s_4\ldots)=s_2s_3s_4\ldots\) whenever \(s_1\in T^+_\sigma\) and \(\bar{s_2}\bar{s_3}\bar{s_4}\dots\), otherwise. Let \(\prec_\sigma\) be the linear order on \(\mathcal{W}_k\) defined by \(s = s_1s_2s_3\dots \prec_\sigma t_1t_2t_3\dots = t\) if \(s_1<t_1\), or \(s_1=t_1\in T^+_\sigma\) and \(s_2s_3\dots \prec_\sigma t_2t_3\dots\), or \(s_1=t_1\in T^-_\sigma\) and \(t_2t_3\dots \prec_\sigma s_2s_3\dots\). The signed shift is then the map \(\Sigma_\sigma : (\mathcal{W}_k,\prec\sigma)\to(\mathcal{W}_k,\prec_\sigma)\) defined by \(\Sigma_\sigma(s_1s_2s_3s_4\ldots) = s_2s_3s_4\dots\). Let \(\mathcal{S}_n\) denote the set of permutations of \([n]\). We say that \(\tau\in\mathcal{S}_n\) contains \(\rho\in\mathcal{S}_m\) if there exist indices \(i_1<i_2<\ldots<i_m\) such that \(\text{st}(\tau_{i_1},\tau_{i_2},\ldots,\tau_{i_m})=\rho_1\rho_2\ldots\rho_m\). Otherwise, we say that \(\tau\) avoids \(\rho\). The set of permutations avoiding \(\rho\) is denoted by \(\text{Av}(\rho)\). A set of permutations \(\mathcal{A}\) is called a (permutation) class if it is closed under pattern containment. Given classes \(\mathcal{A}_0,\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots,\mathcal{A}_{k-1}\), their juxtaposition, denoted by \([\mathcal{A}_0,\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots,\mathcal{A}_{k-1}]\), is the set of permutations that can be expressed as concatenations \(\alpha_0\alpha_1\ldots\alpha_{k-1}\) where \(\text{st}(\alpha_t)\in\mathcal{A}_t\) for all \(0\leqslant t< k\). Let \(\mathcal{S}_\sigma\) be the juxtaposition \([\mathcal{A}_0,\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots ,\mathcal{A}_{k-1}]\) where, for \(0\leqslant t< k\), \(\mathcal{A}_t\) is \(\text{Av}(21)\) if \(\sigma_t=+\) and \(\text{Av}(12)\), otherwise. Let \(\mathcal{S}_n^\sigma=\mathcal{S}^\sigma\cap \mathcal{S}_n\). The set of cyclic permutations in \(\mathcal{S}_n\) (respectively, \(\mathcal{S}^\sigma\), \(\mathcal{S}^\sigma_n\)) is denoted by \(\mathcal{C}_n\) (respectively, \(\mathcal{C}^\sigma\), \(\mathcal{C}^\sigma_n\)). For a permutation \(\pi=\pi_1\pi_2\ldots\pi_n\) in one-line notation \(\hat{\pi}\) is \((\pi_1,\pi_2,\ldots,\pi_n)\) in cyclic notation. The authors give an outstanding proof to show that for a \(\sigma\in\{+,-\}^k\) with \(\sigma\neq -^k\), \(\pi\in\mathcal{P}(\Sigma_\sigma)\) if and only if \(\hat{\pi}\in\mathcal{C}^\sigma\). Moreover, it is shown that if \(\sigma=-^k\) then \(\pi\in\mathcal{P}_n(\Sigma_\sigma)\) implies that \(\hat{\pi}\in\mathcal{C}_n^\sigma\) and the converse holds if \(n\neq 2~\bmod 4\). It is also proved that \(p_n(\Sigma_{+-})=\frac{1}{2n}\sum_{d|n,~d~\text{odd}}\mu(d)2^{\frac{n}{d}}\), where \(\mu\) is the Möbius function. Let \(k\)-shift be the map \(\Sigma_k= \Sigma_\sigma\), where \(\sigma=+^k\). The author give some recursive formulas for \(p_n(\Sigma_k)\) for \(n\geqslant2\). Similar facts concerning the reverse \(k\)-shift map \(\Sigma_k^-= \Sigma_\sigma\), where \(\sigma=-^k\) are also given. In the last short section of the paper, using the formulas that the authors have found for the number of periodic patterns of the maps \(\Sigma_{+-}\), \(\Sigma_k\) and \(\Sigma_k^-\), they enumerate the number of cyclic permutations that avoid some certain patterns.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    periodic pattern
    0 references
    signed shift
    0 references
    cyclic permutation
    0 references
    descent
    0 references
    pattern avoidance
    0 references
    reverse shift
    0 references
    periodic orbit
    0 references
    0 references