Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all (Q2457883)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5204182
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5204182

      Statements

      Magnetic charges or why it is sometimes reasonable to model something mathematically that does not exist at all (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      23 October 2007
      0 references
      In the presence of currents and electric charges Maxwell equations suffer from a lack of symmetry because there are not discovered any magnetic charges (up to now?). On the other hand fictive magnetic charges can be useful in applications; an example is discussed impressively in the present paper with the aim to reduce errors in computational electromagnetics. Considering Maxwell's equations \[ (1)\quad{\vec E}_t - c^2 \nabla \times \vec B = -\frac{\vec j}{{\varepsilon}_0}, \qquad (2) \quad {\vec B}_t + \nabla \times \vec E = 0, \qquad (3) \quad \nabla \cdot \vec E = \frac{q}{{\varepsilon}_0}, \qquad (4) \quad \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0, \] the main idea is sketched in the following. The magnetic flux density \(\vec B\) can be computed from equation (2) for known electric field intensity \(\vec E\) and a given initial value for the magnetic flux density. Equation (4) is true for all times for an divergence-free initial value of the magnetic flux density because (4) can be deduced from (2) according the theorem that the divergence of the curl of any vector is identically zero. But, using numerical methods it can be that the condition of solenoidal magnetic flux density (4) is not fulfilled for all times because of discretisation and rounding errors. Thus, it is proposed to change the equations (2) and (4) to \[ {\vec B}_t + \nabla \times \vec E = - {\vec j}^M, \qquad \nabla \cdot \vec B = q^M \] with a fictive magnetic current density \({\vec j}^M\) and a fictive magnetic charge \(q^M\), that establish the above by the reviewer mentioned symmetry with the corresponding conservation relation of magnetic charge \(q^M_t + \nabla \cdot {\vec j}^M = 0\). This total magnetic charge can be written as \(q^M_t(\phi) + \nabla \cdot {\vec j}^M(\phi) = 0\) in order to reduce the number of variables in the ``symmetric'' Maxwell equations; that is necessary now. An appropriate ansatz like \(q^M(\phi) = \phi, \quad {\vec j}^M(\phi) = \phi \vec v\) (\(\vec v\) fictive velocity) or \(q^M(\phi) = \alpha \phi + \beta {\phi}_t, \quad {\vec j}^M(\phi) = - \nabla \phi\) (\(\alpha, \beta \) parameter) leads to equations which can be used such that the total magnetic charge converges to zero with time \(t\). Examples of such auxiliary equations are a linear advection equation, the heat conduction equation, the wave equation and the telegraph equation. The numerical efficiency of the different variants is discussed. The application of the method is outlined for the simulation of the Sun's surface by magnetohydrodynamic equations.
      0 references
      fictive magnetic charge
      0 references
      fictive magnetic current density
      0 references
      fictive velocity, fictive conservation relation of magnetic charge
      0 references
      error reduction in computer simulations
      0 references
      linear advection equation
      0 references
      heat conduction equation
      0 references
      wave equation
      0 references
      telegraph equation
      0 references
      Hodge operator
      0 references
      magnetohydrodynamic equations
      0 references
      sun surface
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references