How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds (Q2476985)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5248718
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5248718 |
Statements
How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds (English)
0 references
12 March 2008
0 references
\textit{V. Klee} and \textit{G. J. Minty} [in: Inequalities III, Proc. 3rd Symp. Los Angeles 1969, 159--175 (1972; Zbl 0297.90047)] gave an example for which the simplex method takes an exponential number of iterations. By refining a variant of the Klee--Minty example, the authors exhibit a nearly worst-case example for path-following interior point methods. It has been proven that solving this \(n\)-dimensional linear optimization problem requires at least 2 of power n minus 1 iterations.
0 references
linear programming
0 references
interior point method
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.8426748514175415
0 references
0.8218986392021179
0 references
0.7844548225402832
0 references
0.7834979295730591
0 references
0.7809708118438721
0 references