Fast generalized cross validation using Krylov subspace methods (Q2481402)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5261710
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Fast generalized cross validation using Krylov subspace methods
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5261710

      Statements

      Fast generalized cross validation using Krylov subspace methods (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      9 April 2008
      0 references
      The key step of the generalized cross-validation (GCV) method, used in a smoothing spline fitting of noisy data, is the computation of the optimal parameter \(\lambda \) by minimization of the GCV function \[ \text{GCV}(\lambda )= n\, {z^T (Q+\lambda I)^{-2} z \over [ \text{tr}\, ((Q+\lambda I)^{-1})]^2}, \] for the influence matrix \(Q\) and the vector of observations \(z\). A standard approach to minimization is a line-search, so that a straightforward implementation of this method makes it necessary to solve in each iteration two large linear systems with dense matrices of the form \(Q+\lambda I\) and \((Q+\lambda I)^2\). Without a good preconditioner, even an iterative approach to the solution of these systems is time consuming. A key observation of the authors is that the Krylov subspaces are invariant with respect to shifting the original matrix by a multiple of \(I\), which suggests a possibility of a ``re-usable'' generation of the orthogonal Krylov basis. Using the Lanczos method of computing such a basis and taking into account some recurrence relations connecting different values of \(\lambda \), an algorithm is suggested, in which each evaluation of the GCV function makes use of the work that was previously performed. This fast GCV framework allows a substantial saving in computational cost. The paper contains the theoretical development of the algorithm, discusses convergence, stability and complexity issues, as well as presents a series of numerical examples illustrating the benefits of this approach.
      0 references
      generalized cross validation
      0 references
      Krylov subspace method
      0 references
      smoothing spline fitting of noisy data
      0 references
      Lanczos method
      0 references
      algorithm
      0 references
      convergence
      0 references
      stability
      0 references
      complexity
      0 references
      complexity issues
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers