On knots with trivial Alexander polynomial (Q2494186)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On knots with trivial Alexander polynomial
scientific article

    Statements

    On knots with trivial Alexander polynomial (English)
    0 references
    19 June 2006
    0 references
    A knot \(K\) in \(3\)-space (or, more generally, in an integral homology sphere) is said to have minimal Seifert rank if it admits a Seifert surface whose genus equals the rank of the Seifert form. In this case, the Alexander polynomial of \(K\) is trivial. The authors prove that the converse does not hold: There are knots with trivial Alexander polynomial which do not have minimal Seifert rank. The proof uses the \(2\)-loop part \(Q(K)\) of the rational version of the Kontsevich integral of \(K\), defined by the first author and \textit{A. Kricker} [Geom. Topol. 8, 115--204 (2004; Zbl 1075.57004)], and the results on the effects on \(Q(K)\) of null-moves (which are \(Y\)-clasper surgeries with null-homologous leaves in the knot complement), obtained by the first author and \textit{L. Rozansky} [Topology 43, No. 5, 1183--1210 (2004; Zbl 1052.57011)]. It is also shown that \(Q(K)\) of a knot \(K\) of minimal Seifert rank is completely determined by three finite type invariants of \(K\) of degrees \(3,5,5\). The starting point of the paper is a wrong lemma of \textit{M. H. Freedman} [Invent. Math. 68, 195--226 (1982; Zbl 0504.57016)] contradicting the main result of the paper under review. In the appendix, the authors give a direct argument for the fact that knots with trivial Alexander polynomial are topologically slice, avoiding Freedman's wrong lemma.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    knot
    0 references
    Alexander polynomial
    0 references
    Seifert form
    0 references
    Kontsevich integral
    0 references
    null move
    0 references
    clasper
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references