When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence? (Q2495418)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5037309
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence?
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5037309

      Statements

      When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence? (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      30 June 2006
      0 references
      The authors study various conditions when the moment equality \(E( X^k Y^l) = E (X^k) E(Y^l)\) for all \(k,l \in \mathbb{N}\) for a bivariate random variable \((X,Y)\) implies independence of \(X\) and \(Y\). In particular, let \(K\) and \(L\) be subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\), and suppose that \(X\) and \(Y\) take only values in \(K\) and \(L\), respectively, and suppose further that the distributions of \(X\) and \(Y\) are determined by their integer moments \(E (X^k)\) (\(k\in\mathbb{N}\)) and \(E(Y^k)\) (\(k\in\mathbb{N}\)), respectively. Then it is shown that the equation above implies independence of \(X\) and \(Y\). A converse of this theorem is also obtained, showing that whenever \(X\) is not determined by its integer moments and the moments of \(Y\) do not correspond to those of a discrete measure, then the equation above does not imply independence of \(X\) and \(Y\).
      0 references
      moments
      0 references
      moment sequence
      0 references
      determinate
      0 references
      indeterminate
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references