When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence? (Q2495418)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5037309
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5037309 |
Statements
When does \(E(X^{k}\cdot Y^{l})=E(X^{k})\cdot E(Y^{l})\) imply independence? (English)
0 references
30 June 2006
0 references
The authors study various conditions when the moment equality \(E( X^k Y^l) = E (X^k) E(Y^l)\) for all \(k,l \in \mathbb{N}\) for a bivariate random variable \((X,Y)\) implies independence of \(X\) and \(Y\). In particular, let \(K\) and \(L\) be subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\), and suppose that \(X\) and \(Y\) take only values in \(K\) and \(L\), respectively, and suppose further that the distributions of \(X\) and \(Y\) are determined by their integer moments \(E (X^k)\) (\(k\in\mathbb{N}\)) and \(E(Y^k)\) (\(k\in\mathbb{N}\)), respectively. Then it is shown that the equation above implies independence of \(X\) and \(Y\). A converse of this theorem is also obtained, showing that whenever \(X\) is not determined by its integer moments and the moments of \(Y\) do not correspond to those of a discrete measure, then the equation above does not imply independence of \(X\) and \(Y\).
0 references
moments
0 references
moment sequence
0 references
determinate
0 references
indeterminate
0 references
0 references
0.7667257785797119
0 references
0.7516991496086121
0 references
0.7180092930793762
0 references