Tightness and efficiency of irreducible automorphisms of handlebodies (Q2501677)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5052470
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Tightness and efficiency of irreducible automorphisms of handlebodies
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5052470

      Statements

      Tightness and efficiency of irreducible automorphisms of handlebodies (English)
      0 references
      11 September 2006
      0 references
      In order to attempt a classification of automorphisms of \(3\)-manifolds one is led to study automorphisms of handlebodies and compression bodies. Oertel showed that an automorphism \(f\) of a handlebody \(H\) is either periodic or reducible or irreducible. Here \(f\) is \textit{reducible} if there are (up to isotopy) an \(f\)-invariant essential compression body or essential annuli in \(H\) or \(H\) admits an \(f\)-invariant \(I\)-bundle structure. \(f\) is \textit{irreducible} if its restriction to \(\partial H\) is pseudo-Anosov and there is no closed surface \(F\) that is the interior boundary of an essential \(f\)-invariant compression body in \(H\). In the irreducible case Oertel showed that one can choose a concentric handlebody \(H_0\) in \({int}(H)\) such that \(f\) can be isotoped so that \(H_1=f(H_0)\) contains \(H_0\) in its interior, and \(\bigcup_{i\in\mathbb{Z}} f^i(H_0) = { int}(H)\). This leads to a two-dimensional measured lamination \((\Lambda , \mu)\) of \({ int}(H)\) and a transverse one-dimensional measured singular lamination \((\Omega,\nu)\) of \(H_0\) such that the leaves of \(\Lambda \) are open discs and fill \(H_0\), \(\Lambda \cup \partial H\) is closed in \(H\), \(\Lambda \cap \Omega\) is disjoint from the singular set of \(\Omega\), and after an isotopy of \(f\), \(f(\Lambda, \mu) =(\Lambda, \lambda \mu)\) and \(f(\Omega,\nu)=(\Omega, \lambda^{-1} \nu)\), for some \(\lambda>1\). The author addresses the problem of characterizing canonical laminations for a given irreducible \(f\). He proves that if \(\Lambda\) is tight then the growth rate \(\lambda\) is minimal . He shows that the converse is true under some technical conditions which hold for genus two handlebodies. As corollaries he obtains the results that if \(\Lambda\) is tight, then the growth rate \(\lambda\) is less than or equal to the growth rate of the restriction of \(f\) to \({\partial H}\) and the minimal growth \(\lambda_{\min}(f^n)\) is \((\lambda_{\min}(f))^n\), for any power \(f^n\).
      0 references
      handlebody
      0 references
      pseudo-Anosov
      0 references
      measured lamination
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers