Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (Q2565889)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209597
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping?
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209597

      Statements

      Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      28 September 2005
      0 references
      Given a quasisymmetric self-homeomorphism \(h\) of the unit circle \(S^1\), let \(Q(h)\) be the set of all quasiconformal mappings with the correspondence \(h\). In ''Unique extremality'', [J. Anal. Math. 75, 299--338 (1998; Zbl 0929.30017)], by \textit{V. Božin, N. Lakic, V. Marković} and \textit{M. Mateljević}, it was shown that there exists \(h\) for which no extremal extension as a Teichmüller mapping is possible. This disproved some long standing conjectures. In the example constructed there, the boundary correspondence had a single extremal quasiconformal extension. In this paper we show that even when there are infinitely many quasiconformal extensions of the boundary values, it may still happen that none of them is a Teichmüller mapping. An infinitesimal version of this result is also established.
      0 references
      quasisymmetric homeomorphism
      0 references
      quasiconformal mapping
      0 references
      boundary correspondence
      0 references
      extremal
      0 references
      Teichmüller mapping.
      0 references

      Identifiers