Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (Q2565889)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209597
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209597 |
Statements
Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (English)
0 references
28 September 2005
0 references
Given a quasisymmetric self-homeomorphism \(h\) of the unit circle \(S^1\), let \(Q(h)\) be the set of all quasiconformal mappings with the correspondence \(h\). In ''Unique extremality'', [J. Anal. Math. 75, 299--338 (1998; Zbl 0929.30017)], by \textit{V. Božin, N. Lakic, V. Marković} and \textit{M. Mateljević}, it was shown that there exists \(h\) for which no extremal extension as a Teichmüller mapping is possible. This disproved some long standing conjectures. In the example constructed there, the boundary correspondence had a single extremal quasiconformal extension. In this paper we show that even when there are infinitely many quasiconformal extensions of the boundary values, it may still happen that none of them is a Teichmüller mapping. An infinitesimal version of this result is also established.
0 references
quasisymmetric homeomorphism
0 references
quasiconformal mapping
0 references
boundary correspondence
0 references
extremal
0 references
Teichmüller mapping.
0 references
0 references
0.886435329914093
0 references
0.8624095916748047
0 references
0.8479375839233398
0 references
0.8468689918518066
0 references
0.8386279344558716
0 references