When is length a length function? (Q2575727)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2235816
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | When is length a length function? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2235816 |
Statements
When is length a length function? (English)
0 references
6 December 2005
0 references
This paper considers two notions of length. One is defined in terms of factorization: given a nonzero element \(x\) in a (commutative) half-factorial domain \(R\), \(\ell(x)\) is the number of factors in an atomic factorization of \(x\). The other is the length \(\lambda(I)\) of an ideal \(I\), which is the length of the enlarged total quotient ring \(\text{MTot}(R/I)\) as module over itself. The authors show that \(\lambda(Rx)\) defines a length function in the first sense provided \(R\) is almost-noetherian, and moreover this length function is a linear combination of discrete valuations under further conditions. These results lead to a characterization of weakly Krull almost-noetherian domains and to an analysis of their integral closures and length functions. Further results concern elasticity when there is not a unique length for atomic factorizations. The authors give numerous examples to illustrate the theory.
0 references
ideal-length
0 references
length function
0 references
almost-noetherian domain
0 references
\(\Sigma_1\)-noetherian
0 references
0 references
0.75535566
0 references
0 references
0 references