The distribution of class groups of function fields (Q2576930)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The distribution of class groups of function fields
scientific article

    Statements

    The distribution of class groups of function fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 December 2005
    0 references
    The author gives for some general families of curves over a finite field \({\mathbb F}_ q\) and a finite elementary abelian \(\ell\)-group \(H\) with \(\ell\) odd and relatively prime to \(q\), an explicit formula for the proportion of curves \(C\) such that \(\roman {Jac}(C)[\ell]({\mathbb F} _ q) \cong H\). Here \(\roman {Jac}(C)[\ell]({\mathbb F}_ q)\) denotes the \(\ell\)-torsion of the Jacobian of \(C\) over \({\mathbb F}_ q\). The main result of the paper, Theorem 3.1, establishes the general statement for any abelian \(\ell\)-group \(H\) and in particular for the special case where \(H\) is an elementary abelian \(\ell\)-group. The main tools are calculations in the symplectic group \(\roman {Sp} _ {2g}({\mathbb F}_ q)\) and a result of \textit{N. M. Katz} and \textit{P. Sarnak} [Random matrices, Frobenius eigenvalues, and monodromy, Colloquium Publications. 45. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (1999; Zbl 0958.11004)] that shows that some Frobenius elements are equidistributed in the monodromy group. In the last section, the paper concludes with some examples. It recovers results of \textit{H. W. Lenstra jun.} [Ann. Math. (2) 126, 649--673 (1987; Zbl 0629.10006)]; justifies a heuristic used by \textit{E.-U. Gekeler} [Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003, No. 37, 1999--2018 (2003; Zbl 1104.11033)]; improves results of \textit{D. A. Cardon} and \textit{M. Ram Murty} [Can. Math. Bull. 44, No. 4, 398--407 (2001; Zbl 0999.11069)]; and discusses a conjecture of \textit{E. Friedman} and \textit{L. C. Washington} [Théorie des nombres, C. R. Conf. Int., Quebec/Can. 1987, 227--239 (1989; Zbl 0693.12013)]. In particular, the author compares the predictions of Friedman and Washington to the result of Theorem 3.1 and this turns out to be incompatible with the conjecture of Friedman and Washington.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Cohen-Lenstra heuristics
    0 references
    \(\ell\)--Sylow subgroups of class groups
    0 references
    distribution of class groups
    0 references
    Jacobians
    0 references
    congruence function fields.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references