An empirical study of comparing DEA and SFA methods to measure hospital units' efficiency (Q2627538)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An empirical study of comparing DEA and SFA methods to measure hospital units' efficiency
scientific article

    Statements

    An empirical study of comparing DEA and SFA methods to measure hospital units' efficiency (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 May 2017
    0 references
    Summary: The paper aims to examine the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) results in order to facilitate a common understanding about the adequacy of these methods, defining any differences in healthcare efficiency estimation. A two-stage bootstrap DEA method and the Translog formula of the SFA were performed. Multi-inputs and multi-outputs were used in both of the approaches assuming two scenarios either including environmental variables or not. Thirty-two Greek public hospital units constitute the sample. DEA and SFA were found to yield divergent efficiency estimates due to many factors such as the nature of the environmental variables, the measurement error and other random factors. Environmental variables being hospital status and geographical position were found significantly correlating with inefficiency. The analysis concludes that the choice of the appropriate mathematical form depends on the expertise of the researcher and the purpose of the evaluation.
    0 references
    healthcare efficiency
    0 references
    data envelopment analysis
    0 references
    DEA
    0 references
    stochastic frontier analysis
    0 references
    SFA
    0 references
    bootstrap
    0 references
    translog form
    0 references
    operational research
    0 references
    health services
    0 references
    Greece
    0 references
    public hospital units
    0 references
    efficiency estimates
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references