A comparative study on recently-introduced nature-based global optimization methods in complex mechanical system design (Q2633187)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparative study on recently-introduced nature-based global optimization methods in complex mechanical system design
scientific article

    Statements

    A comparative study on recently-introduced nature-based global optimization methods in complex mechanical system design (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 May 2019
    0 references
    Summary: Advanced global optimization algorithms have been continuously introduced and improved to solve various complex design optimization problems for which the objective and constraint functions can only be evaluated through computation intensive numerical analyses or simulations with a large number of design variables. The often implicit, multimodal, and ill-shaped objective and constraint functions in high-dimensional and ``black-box'' forms demand the search to be carried out using low number of function evaluations with high search efficiency and good robustness. This work investigates the performance of six recently introduced, nature-inspired global optimization methods: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Firefly Algorithm (FFA), Cuckoo Search (CS), Bat Algorithm (BA), Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). These approaches are compared in terms of search efficiency and robustness in solving a set of representative benchmark problems in smooth-unimodal, non-smooth unimodal, smooth multimodal, and non-smooth multimodal function forms. In addition, four classic engineering optimization examples and a real-life complex mechanical system design optimization problem, floating offshore wind turbines design optimization, are used as additional test cases representing computationally-expensive black-box global optimization problems. Results from this comparative study show that the ability of these global optimization methods to obtain a good solution diminishes as the dimension of the problem, or number of design variables increases. Although none of these methods is universally capable, the study finds that GWO and ABC are more efficient on average than the other four in obtaining high quality solutions efficiently and consistently, solving 86\% and 80\% of the tested benchmark problems, respectively. The research contributes to future improvements of global optimization methods.
    0 references
    nature based optimization
    0 references
    artificial bee colony
    0 references
    firefly algorithm
    0 references
    cuckoo search
    0 references
    bat algorithm
    0 references
    flower pollination algorithm
    0 references
    grey wolf optimizer
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers