On a \(p\)-adic invariant cycles theorem (Q2634633)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On a \(p\)-adic invariant cycles theorem
scientific article

    Statements

    On a \(p\)-adic invariant cycles theorem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    18 February 2016
    0 references
    Let \(V\) be a discrete valuation ring with perfect residue field \(k\) of characteristic \(p>0\) and with fraction field \(K\) of characteristic \(0\). It contains the fraction field \(K_0\) of \(W(k)\). Let \(X\) be a proper regular scheme over \(V\) with semistable reduction, with special fibre \(X_k\) and generic fibre \(X_K\). The theory of log schemes and log crystalline cohomology allows us to define on the de Rham cohomology groups \(H^i_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K)\) of \(X_K\) a nilpotent monodromy operator \(N\). On the other hand, we have the rigid cohomology groups \(H^i_{\mathrm{rig}}(X_k/K_0)\) of \(X_k\) (which are finite dimensional \(K_0\)-vector spaces), together with a natural map \(H^i_{\mathrm{rig}}(X_k/K_0)\otimes_{K_0}K{\iota}{\longrightarrow} H^i_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K)\). The composition \[ H^i_{\mathrm{rig}}(X_k/K_0)\otimes_{K_0}K{\iota}{\longrightarrow} H^i_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K){N}{\longrightarrow} H^i_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K) \] is know to be the zero map. A fundamental question now is whether this sequence is actually exact. If \(k\) is finite then this exactness would be implied by the correctness of the monodromy weight conjecture in this context. As this conjecture is known to be true for \(X\) of (relative) dimension \(1\) and \(2\), the exactness of the sequence is known accordingly. For \(i=1\) one even obtains (for such \(X\)) an exact sequence \[ 0\to H^1_{\mathrm{rig}}(X_k/K_0)\otimes_{K_0}K{\iota}{\longrightarrow} H^1_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K){N}{\longrightarrow} H^1_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K).\tag{cyc} \] In the case of relative dimension \(1\) (i.e. semistable curves), several alternative definitions of \(N\) acting on \(H^1_{\mathrm{dR}}(X_K)\) have been given in past, as well as versions with nontrivial coefficients (i.e. in log-\(F\)-isocrystals). In the present paper, using one of these alternative definitions, the exactness of (cyc) is proven without assuming that \(k\) be finite. Moreover, the question is studied for which class of nontrivial coefficients (assumed to be induced from convergent isocrystals on the special fibre \(X_k\)) exactness of the corresponding sequence analogous to (cyc) can be expected. For unipotent convergent isocrystals, a criterion for exactness of the sequence is given; it shows in particular that exactness often fails to hold.
    0 references
    rigid cohomology
    0 references
    invariant cycle theorem
    0 references
    monodromy operator
    0 references
    semistable reduction
    0 references
    isocrystal
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references