Perturbed variations of penalty function methods. Example: Projective SUMT (Q2639773)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Perturbed variations of penalty function methods. Example: Projective SUMT |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4185401
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Perturbed variations of penalty function methods. Example: Projective SUMT |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4185401 |
Statements
Perturbed variations of penalty function methods. Example: Projective SUMT (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
This article is motivated by the Projective SUMT (Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique) proposed originally by G. P. McCormick. The Projective SUMT is a penalty function technique for solving a certain convex programming problem, based on solving the differential equation associated with a barrier function minimizing trajectory. The author shows that the Projective SUMT is a simple variation of the classical SUMT and that all results (convexity and duality results, convergence, satisfaction of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions, etc.) that have been developed for the classical SUMT are applicable to the Projective SUMT with simple modifications. The author defines new classes of penalty functions by introducing simple linear perturbations of classical penalty functions or, equivalently, perturbations of the given convex programming problem. Further, the author indicates several classes of augmented penalty functions that he feels merit further study.
0 references
Projective SUMT
0 references
penalty function
0 references
0 references
0.833151638507843
0 references
0.8023061156272888
0 references
0.7892780303955078
0 references
0.7808058857917786
0 references