Multiple splitting property for dominated bilinear operators (Q2660997)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiple splitting property for dominated bilinear operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiple splitting property for dominated bilinear operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 April 2021
    0 references
    Given a Banach space \(X\), \(0<p<\infty\) and \((x_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(X\), the author lets \(\ell_p((x_i)_{i=1}^n)\) denote \(\left(\sum_{i=1}^n\|x_i\|^p\right)^{ 1/p}\) and \(w_p((x_i)_{i=1}^n)\) denote \(\sup_{\|\phi\|\le 1}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n| \phi(x_i)|^p\right)^{1/p}\). When \(X\), \(Y\) and \(Z\) are Banach spaces and \(1\le p, r<\infty\), defining \(s\) by \(\frac{1}{s}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{r}\), the author says that a bilinear operator \(U\colon X\times Y\to Z\) is \((p,r)\)-dominated if there is \(C>0\) so that, given \((x_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(X\) and \((y_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(Y\), \[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\|U(x_i,y_i)\|^s\right)^{1/s}\le Cw_p((x_i)_{i=1}^n) w_r((y_i)_{i=1}^n). \] A bilinear operator \(U\colon X\times Y\to Z\) is said to be multiple \(p\)-summing if there is \(C>0\) so that, given \((x_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(X\) and \((y_j)_{j=1}^m\) in \(Y\), \[ \left(\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m}\|U(x_i,y_j)\|^p\right)^{1/p}\le Cw_p((x_i)_{i=1}^n) w_p((y_j)_{j=1}^m). \] The main result of the paper is that if \(X\), \(Y\) and \(Z\) are Banach spaces, \(1\le p<q, r<\infty\) are such that \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}\) and \(U\colon X\times Y\to Z\) is \((p,r)\)-dominated or \((r,p)\)-dominated, then there is \(C>0\) such that for each \((x_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(X\) and \((y_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(Y\) there are \((\lambda_i)_{i=1}^n\) and \((\nu_i)_{i=1}^n\) in \(\mathbb{K}\) and \((z_{ij})_{i,j=1}^n\) in \(Z\) such that: \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] \(U(x_i,y_j)=\lambda_i\nu_jz_{ij}\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(1\le j\le n\), \item[(b)] \(\ell_r((\lambda_i)_{i=1}^n)\le 1\) and \(\ell_r((\nu_j)_{j=1}^n)\le 1\), \item[(c)] \(w_q((z_{ij})_{i,j=1}^n)\le Cw_p((x_i)_{i=1}^n)w_p((y_j)_{j=1}^n)\). \end{itemize} Moreover, it is shown that \(C\) can be chosen to be the \((p,r)\)-dominated (\((r,p)\)-dominated) norm of \(U\). Using this result, the author proves that if \(1\le p<q, r<\infty\) and \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}\), then the composition of a \((p,r)\)-dominated (\((r,p)\)-dominated) bilinear operator and a \(q\)-summing operator is multiple \(p\)-summing. A bilinear mapping \(U\colon X\times Y\to Z\) is said to be \(p\)-nuclear if there are sequences \((\phi_n)_n\) in \(X'\), \((\psi_n)_n\) in \(Y'\) and \((z_n)_n\) in \(Z\) with \(\ell_p((\phi_n)_n)<\infty\), \(\ell_p((\psi_n)_n)<\infty\) and \(w_{p^*}( (z_n)_n)<\infty\) (\(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p^*}=1\)) so that \[ U(x,y)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\phi_n(x)\psi_n(y)z_n \] for all \(x\) in \(X\) and \(y\) in \(Y\). The author shows that if \(1\le p, r<\infty\) are such that \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}\), \(A\) and \(B\) are \(r\)-nuclear operators and \(U\) is an \((r^*,q)\)-dominated bilinear operator, then \(U\circ(A,B)\) is a \(p\)-nuclear bilinear operator.
    0 references
    \((p,r)\)-summing bilinear operators
    0 references
    multiple \(p\)-summing operators
    0 references
    multiple splitting property
    0 references
    \(p\)-nuclear bilinear operators
    0 references

    Identifiers