Exponential characterization in linear viscoelasticity under delay perturbations (Q2682369)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Exponential characterization in linear viscoelasticity under delay perturbations
scientific article

    Statements

    Exponential characterization in linear viscoelasticity under delay perturbations (English)
    0 references
    31 January 2023
    0 references
    The authors consider a second-order integro-differential problem with delay written as \[\partial _{tt}z+A\left( z-\int_{0}^{\infty }g(s)z(t-s)ds\right) +\mu \partial _{t}z(t-\tau )=0,\] with \(t>0\), where \( A:D(A)\subset H\rightarrow H\) is a positive, self-adjoint and densely defined operator, \((H,\left\Vert \cdot \right\Vert ,(\cdot ,\cdot ))\) is a Hilbert space, \(\tau >0\) is the time lag, \(\mu \in \mathbb{R}\) is the delay coefficient and \(g:\mathbb{R}^{+}\rightarrow \lbrack 0,\infty )\) is the memory kernel which is supposed to be absolutely continuous, non-increasing and summable with total mass \(l=\int_{0}^{\infty }g(s)ds\in (0,1)\). The initial conditions are \(z(t)=z_{0}(t)\), \(t\in (-\infty ,0]\), \(\partial _{t}z\mid _{t=0}=z_{1}\), \(\partial _{t}z(t-\tau )=z_{2}(t-\tau )\), \(t\in (0,\infty )\). The authors define the notion of admissible kernel as a function \(g:\mathbb{R}^{+}\rightarrow \lbrack 0,\infty )\) which satisfies \( \int_{s}^{\infty }g(y)dy\leq \Theta g(s)\), \(\forall s>0\), for some \(\Theta >0 \). Let \(\zeta ^{t}(s)=z(t)-z(t-s)\), \(t\geq 0\), \(s>0\) and define the memory space as \( \mathcal{M}=\{\zeta :\mathbb{R}^{+}\rightarrow V\) \, :\, \(\int_{0}^{\infty }g(s)\left\Vert A^{1/2}\zeta (s)\right\Vert ^{2}ds<\infty \}\). Consider the operator \( \mathbb{L}:D(\mathbb{L})\subset \mathcal{M}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}\) defined as \(D(\mathbb{L})=\{\zeta \in \mathcal{M}\), \(\mathbb{L}\zeta \in \mathcal{M}\) with \(\zeta (0)=0\}\), \(\mathbb{L}\zeta =-\partial _{s}\zeta \), and \( v(t,p)=\partial _{t}z(t-\tau p)\), \(p\in (0,1)\). Taking into account the above definitions the authors end up with the following problem: \[\partial _{tt}z+A\left( (1-l)z-\int_{0}^{\infty }g(s)\zeta (t-s)ds\right) +\mu v(1)=0,\] \[\partial _{t}\zeta =\mathbb{L}\zeta +\partial _{t}z, \qquad \tau \partial _{t}v=-\partial _{p}v,\] with \(t>0\), initial conditions \(z(0)=z_{0}(0)\), \(\partial _{t}z(0)=z_{1}\), \(\zeta _{0}(s)=z_{0}(0)-z_{0}(-s)\), \(s>0\), \(v(0,p)=z_{2}(-\tau p)\), \(0<p<1\), and compatibility conditions \(\zeta ^{t}(0)=0\), \(v(t,0)=\partial _{t}z(t)\), \(t>0\). Defining now \(Z=(z,w,\zeta ,v)^{\intercal }\), with \(w=\partial _{t}z\), they rewrite the obtained problem as \[\partial _{t}Z=\mathbb{B}_{\mu }Z,\] with \(t>0\) and initial condition \(Z(0)=Z_{0}\). Using the semigroup approach, they prove that if \(Z_{0}\in \mathcal{H}_{\mu }=V\times H\times \mathcal{M}\times \mathcal{D}\), with \(\mathcal{D}=L^{2}(0,1;H)\), the above problem has a unique mild solution \(Z(t)=S_{\mu }(t)Z_{0}\) in the class \(Z\in C([0,+\infty );\mathcal{H}_{\mu })\). The main result of the paper is the following: if \(g\) is an admissible kernel which satisfies the above conditions and if the flatness rate of \(g\) is less than 1/2, then there exists a constant \(\mu _{0}>0\), independent of \(\mu \), such that \(S_{\mu }(t)=e^{ \mathbb{B}_{\mu }t}\) is exponentially stable on \(\mathcal{H}_{\mu }\), for every \(0<\left\vert \mu \right\vert <\mu _{0}\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    second-order integro-differential problem with delay
    0 references
    admissible kernel
    0 references
    linear viscoelasticity
    0 references
    semi-group
    0 references
    exponential stability
    0 references
    0 references