Evolution of plane curves driven by a nonlinear function of curvature and anisotropy (Q2706089)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1578737
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Evolution of plane curves driven by a nonlinear function of curvature and anisotropy |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1578737 |
Statements
19 March 2001
0 references
tangential velocity
0 references
flowing finite volumes
0 references
computational instabilities
0 references
Evolution of plane curves driven by a nonlinear function of curvature and anisotropy (English)
0 references
The authors consider a family of evolving curves whose position vector \(\vec{X}\) satisfies the equation \({\partial}_t \vec{X} = \beta (k, \nu) \vec{N} + \alpha \vec{T}.\) While the normal component of the velocity, which is a function of the curvature \(k\) and the tangential angle \(\nu\), is the only one that determines the shape of the evolving curves, the tangential velocity \(\alpha\) proves to be useful in numerical schemes. It is shown that if \(\alpha\) is the solution of a certain nonlocal equation, which has the effect of uniformly redistributing the material points along the curve, the numerical scheme derived via the flowing finite volumes prevents the formation of computational instabilities. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe first part of the paper is devoted to the the study of the short time existence of classical solutions, first in the case when \(\partial_k\beta\) is nondegenerate in the sense that the derivative of (class \(C^2\)) \(\beta\) with respect to \(k\) is uniformly bounded below and above by two strictly positive constants, and then in the singular case when \(\beta(k, \nu)=\gamma(\nu) |k|^{m-1}k\) for \(m \in (0,1) \cup (1, 2]\), extending the result due to Angenent, Sapiro and Tannenbaum for \(m=1/3\). The second part deals with the numerical solutions. In particular, it presents a comparison between results obtained by considering trivial and, respectively, nontrivial tangential velocities.
0 references
0.8741288185119629
0 references
0.8460126519203186
0 references
0.8460126519203186
0 references
0.835192084312439
0 references