Differences in the effects of rounding errors in Krylov solvers for symmetric indefinite linear systems (Q2706285)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1578911
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Differences in the effects of rounding errors in Krylov solvers for symmetric indefinite linear systems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1578911

      Statements

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      19 March 2001
      0 references
      symmetric indefinite linear systems
      0 references
      iterative methods
      0 references
      stability
      0 references
      MINRES
      0 references
      GMRES
      0 references
      SYMMLQ
      0 references
      rounding errors
      0 references
      Differences in the effects of rounding errors in Krylov solvers for symmetric indefinite linear systems (English)
      0 references
      The authors discuss in what a way and to what extent the well known MINRES (minimal residual), GMRES (generalized minimal residual) and SYMMLQ (symmetric LQ) methods differ in their sensitivity to rounding errors. They show that the method of solution may lead, under certain circumstances, to large additional errors, which are not corrected by continuing the iteration process. A way of analyzing the above mentioned methods is proposed which does not attempt to derive sharper upper bounds but to derive upper bounds for relevant differences between these processes in finite precision arithmetic. The authors' approach allows to answer some practical questions: NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE(i) When and why is MINRES less accurate than SYMMLQ?NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE(ii) Is MINRES suspect for ill-conditioned systems?NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE(iii) Why and when does SYMMLQ converge slower than MINRES and GMRES?NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE(iv) Why does MINRES sometimes lead to rather large residuals, whereas the error in the approximation is significantly smaller?
      0 references

      Identifiers