Functions of least gradient and BV functions (Q2707694)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1584068
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Functions of least gradient and BV functions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1584068

      Statements

      0 references
      3 April 2001
      0 references
      functions of bounded variations
      0 references
      least gradient problem
      0 references
      minimal surfaces
      0 references
      extension theorems
      0 references
      Sobolev spaces
      0 references
      Dirichlet condition
      0 references
      Functions of least gradient and BV functions (English)
      0 references
      The lectures have essentially three parts in which always \(\Omega \subset \mathbb R ^n\) is an open set. First, we look for a minimizer of \(\|\nabla u\|\) among all functions \(u\in BV(\Omega)\) satisfying \(u=g\) on \(\partial \Omega \) in the sense of traces. Here \(\nabla u\) is ``full'' (i.e. including singular part) distributional derivative of \(u\) and \(\|\nabla u\|\) its variation. The ``Dirichlet condition'' \(g\) is assumed to be continuous. Denoting by \(P(A,U)\) the perimeter of \(A\) in \(U\), we suppose that \(\Omega \) is a Lipschitz domain satisfying \(P(\Omega ,\mathbb R ^n)\leq P(\Omega \cup A,\mathbb R ^n)\) for any small test set \(A\), and that for each ball \(B\) centered at \(\partial \Omega \) there is a set \(E\subset B\) such that \(P(\Omega \setminus E,B)<P(\Omega ,B)\). It is proven that the solution of the minimization problem exists and is continuous. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINENext, given \(v\in \mathbb R \), the problem of finding a set \(E\subset \Omega \) such that \(P(E,\mathbb R ^n)\leq P(F,\mathbb R ^n)\) for all test sets \(F\subset \Omega \), with the volume constraint \(|E|=|F|=v\), is considered. The regularity question is studied, mainly under what additional hypotheses the minimizer is convex. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEFinally, let us consider a function \(f\) on \(\Omega \) and denote by \(f^*\) the function which is \(f\) on \(\Omega \) and zero outside \(\Omega \). If \(f\in BV(\Omega ')\) for each \(\Omega '\subset \Omega \) and \(f^*\) is approximately continuous \(H^{n-1}\)-a.e.\ in \(\mathbb R ^n\), then \(f^*\in BV_{\text{loc}}(\mathbb R ^n)\). If \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega)\), \(1<p<\infty \), and \(f^*\) has a Lebesgue point at \(p\)-capacity-quasi every \(x\in \partial \Omega \), then \(f\in W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)\). These extension theorems differ from previously known, because existence of any weakly differentiable extension of \(f\) to \(\mathbb R ^n\) is not a priori assumed.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0952.00033].
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references