cgam (Q27199)

From MaRDI portal
Constrained Generalized Additive Model
Language Label Description Also known as
English
cgam
Constrained Generalized Additive Model

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    1.20
    16 November 2022
    0 references
    1.0
    5 March 2014
    0 references
    1.1
    17 April 2014
    0 references
    1.2
    10 September 2014
    0 references
    1.3
    1 October 2015
    0 references
    1.4
    15 April 2016
    0 references
    1.5
    5 June 2016
    0 references
    1.6
    2 November 2016
    0 references
    1.7
    3 July 2017
    0 references
    1.8
    2 October 2017
    0 references
    1.9
    15 February 2018
    0 references
    1.10
    11 April 2018
    0 references
    1.11
    28 June 2018
    0 references
    1.12
    8 November 2018
    0 references
    1.13
    23 April 2019
    0 references
    1.14
    1 May 2019
    0 references
    1.15
    13 October 2019
    0 references
    1.16
    29 September 2020
    0 references
    1.17
    13 December 2021
    0 references
    1.18
    18 July 2022
    0 references
    1.19
    4 October 2022
    0 references
    1.21
    10 August 2023
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 August 2023
    0 references
    A constrained generalized additive model is fitted by the cgam routine. Given a set of predictors, each of which may have a shape or order restrictions, the maximum likelihood estimator for the constrained generalized additive model is found using an iteratively re-weighted cone projection algorithm. The ShapeSelect routine chooses a subset of predictor variables and describes the component relationships with the response. For each predictor, the user needs only specify a set of possible shape or order restrictions. A model selection method chooses the shapes and orderings of the relationships as well as the variables. The cone information criterion (CIC) is used to select the best combination of variables and shapes. A genetic algorithm may be used when the set of possible models is large. In addition, the cgam routine implements a two-dimensional isotonic regression using warped-plane splines without additivity assumptions. It can also fit a convex or concave regression surface with triangle splines without additivity assumptions. See Liao X, Meyer MC (2019)<doi:10.18637/jss.v089.i05> for more details.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references