Do Feynman diagrams endorse a particle ontology? The roles of Feynman diagrams in \(S\)-matrix theory (Q2724969)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1618480
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Do Feynman diagrams endorse a particle ontology? The roles of Feynman diagrams in \(S\)-matrix theory
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1618480

      Statements

      12 July 2001
      0 references
      bootstrapped dynamics
      0 references
      Feynman's line drawings
      0 references
      0 references
      Do Feynman diagrams endorse a particle ontology? The roles of Feynman diagrams in \(S\)-matrix theory (English)
      0 references
      From the conclusions: Thus, from the re-interpretation of Feynman's diagrammatic machinery by Landau, Mandelstam, and Cutkosky arose the \(S\)-matrix focus upon bootstrapped dynamics. And from the \(S\)-matrix focus upon such bootstrapped dynamics arose a further re-interpretation of the physical content pictured in Feynman's line drawings. Whereas these diagrams had once been held, in the hands of quantum field theorists, to depict `aristocratic' scatterings amongst foundational, elementary entities, they were now taken to portray the wild dances of exchanges from which emerged a spectrum of `democratic' particles. While these simple lines were arranged the same way pictorially by Feynman in 1948 and by Chew in 1964, the theoretical significance read into these lines had undertaken a sea-change.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0964.00052].
      0 references

      Identifiers