Discrete Euler integration over functions on finite categories (Q272871)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Discrete Euler integration over functions on finite categories
scientific article

    Statements

    Discrete Euler integration over functions on finite categories (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    21 April 2016
    0 references
    The theory of integration with respect to Euler characteristics of finite categories is provided. This is applied to enumerating the targets lying on a poset by sensors. Baryshnikov and Ghrist proved in [\textit{Y. Baryshnikov} et al., SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70, No. 3, 825--844 (2009; Zbl 1190.90041)] that the cardinality of the targets lying on a field can be obtained from the topological Euler integration of the counting function. In the paper, a discrete analogue of this result is obtained. Theorem 2.6. Let both \(A\) and \(B\) be either filters or ideals of a finite category \(C\). If each of \(A\), \(B\), and \(A\cap B\) has a Euler characteristic, then we have \(\chi(A\cup B)=\chi(A)+\chi(B)-\chi(A\cap B)\). In Section 3, \textit{constructive functions} \(f: C\to \mathbb{Q}\) on a finite category \(C\) are defined and \textit{measurable} finite categories are introduced. The definition of Euler integration of constructive functions on a measurable category is given. A number of results about the Euler integration on measurable categories is obtained (Theorem 3.12, Theorem 3.19). Section 4 is devoted to the application of discrete Euler integration to sensor network theory. Let \((P,\leq)\) be a partially ordered set. Its Hasse diagram is considered as a one-dimensional simplicial complex where \(0\)-simplices are elements \(p\in P\) and \(1\)-simplices are pairs \(p<q\) for which \(\{r\in P\mid p<r<q\}=\emptyset\). A \textit{network with sensors} is given by a finite partially ordered set \((P,\leq)\) and a subset \(T\) of the set of all simplices in its Hasse diagram. Elements \(t\in T\) are called \textit{targets}. A target \(t\in T\) is said to be \textit{below} a node \(r\in P\) if \(t\in P\) and \(t\leq r\) or \(t=(p<q)\) and \(q\leq r\). It is denoted by \(t\leq r\). Each \(p\in P\) has a \textit{sensor}. The sensors return the counting function \(h: P\to \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}\) given by the cardinality of targets lying below it: \(h(p)=\{t\in T\mid t\leq p\}^{\sharp}\). Theorem 4.1. Given the counting function \(h: P\to \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}\) for a collection of targets \(T\) in a network \(P\), we have \(T^{\sharp}=\int\limits_{P}h d\chi\).
    0 references
    Euler characteristic
    0 references
    finite categories
    0 references
    posets
    0 references
    theory of integration
    0 references
    sensor networks
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references