Around the Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture (Q273879)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6572408
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Around the Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6572408

      Statements

      Around the Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      22 April 2016
      0 references
      0 references
      coordinate
      0 references
      locally nilpotent derivation
      0 references
      affine algebraic group
      0 references
      action
      0 references
      orbit
      0 references
      Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture
      0 references
      affine algebraic geometry, polynomial authomorphism
      0 references
      This is very nice paper, devoted to the classical Abhyankar-Sathaye conjecture:NEWLINENEWLINEConjecture. \(f \in k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) is an irreducible element whose zero locus in \(\mathbb A^n\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb A^{n-1}\), then \(f\) is a coordinate.NEWLINENEWLINEThis conjecture is equivalent to the claim that every closed embedding NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\mathfrak i:\mathbb A^{n-1}\to\mathbb A^nNEWLINE\]NEWLINE is rectifiable, i.e., there is an automorphism \(\sigma\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb A^n)\) such that \(\sigma\circ\mathfrak i:\mathbb A^{n-1}\to\mathbb A^n\) is the standard embedding.NEWLINENEWLINEThis conjecture is linked to investigation of unipotent group action. The main technical result (of own interest) is Theorem 1, based on the fact of triviality of bundles in rational case. Theorem 2 stating partial case of Abhyankar-Sathaye Conjecture for unipotent group action based on this theorem. A rational version of the strengthened form of the Commuting Derivation Conjecture, in which the assumption of commutativity is dropped, is proved.NEWLINENEWLINEA systematic method of constructing in any dimension greater than 3 the examples answering in the negative a question by \textit{M. El Kahoui} [J. Algebra 289, No. 2, 446--452 (2005; Zbl 1140.13309)] (see Question 1 in the paper) is developed.
      0 references

      Identifiers