Remarks on the interpretation of current nonlinear finite element analyses as differential-algebraic equations (Q2745448)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1654693
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Remarks on the interpretation of current nonlinear finite element analyses as differential-algebraic equations
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1654693

      Statements

      21 July 2003
      0 references
      time adaptivity
      0 references
      consistent tangent
      0 references
      stress computation
      0 references
      multilevel Newton method
      0 references
      quadratical convergence
      0 references
      differential-algebraic equations
      0 references
      diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods
      0 references
      principle of virtual displacements
      0 references
      backward Euler schemes
      0 references
      local time integration
      0 references
      step-size control techniques
      0 references
      Remarks on the interpretation of current nonlinear finite element analyses as differential-algebraic equations (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      For the numerical solution of materially nonlinear problems like in computational plasticity or viscoplasticity, the finite element (FE) discretization in space is usually coupled with pointwise defined evolution equations characterizing the material behaviour. The interpretation of such systems as differential-algebraic equations (DAE) allows modern-day integration algorithms from numerical mathematics to be efficiently applied. Especially, the application of diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods together with a multilevel-Newton (MN) method preserves the algorithmic structure of current FE implementations which are based on the principle of virtual displacements and on backward Euler schemes for local time integration. The quadratical order of convergence of the MN algorithm is usually validated by numerical studies. Here the authors show that an analytical proof can be applied in the current context, based on the DAE interpretation mentioned above. The article concludes with some examples showing the performance of step-size control techniques as well as different integration procedures.
      0 references

      Identifiers