Automorphisms of Cayley graphs of metacyclic groups of prime-power order (Q2765553)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1694848
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Automorphisms of Cayley graphs of metacyclic groups of prime-power order
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1694848

      Statements

      Automorphisms of Cayley graphs of metacyclic groups of prime-power order (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      6 February 2003
      0 references
      Cayley graph
      0 references
      automorphism
      0 references
      metacyclic group
      0 references
      Cayley graphs \(\Gamma= \text{Cay}(G, S)\) are considered (where \(G\) is a finite group, \(1\) is the unit element of \(G\) and \(S\) is a subset of \(G\setminus\{1\})\). We suppose \(S= S^{-1}\) (this means that \(\Gamma\) is substantially undirected). The group of the automorphisms of \(\Gamma\) and \(G\) is denoted by \(\Aut \Gamma\) and \(\Aut G\), respectively. If \(G\) has a normal subgroup \(K\) such that \(K\) and the factor group \(G/K\) are cyclic, then we say that \(G\) is a metacyclic group. The semidirect product of \(G\) and \(H\) is denoted by \(G\rtimes H\). Let the subgroup \(\Aut(G,S)\) of \(\Aut G\) consist of the automorphisms which fix \(S\) globally. It is known that \(G\) is isomorphic to a regular subgroup of \(\Aut \Gamma\). Usually, \(\Aut G\) is much easier to determine than \(\Aut \Gamma\).NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINELet \(G\) be a metacyclic \(p\)-group for an odd prime \(p\). The main result of the paper gives a characterization of \(\Aut \Gamma\) (where \(\Gamma= \text{Cay}(G, S)\)). As a corollary of this theorem, we get that \(\Aut \Gamma\) is isomorphic to \(G\rtimes\Aut(G, S)\) when \(G\) is not abelian and the valency of \(\Gamma\) is less than \(2p\). The main theorem is proved through a sequence of lemmas, dealing mainly with the solubility of the socle of \(\Aut \Gamma\).
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers