Classification of isoparametric hypersurfaces in spheres with \((g,m)=(6,1)\) (Q2792145)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Unfortunately, we do not yet have an article page for this item.

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6552060
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Classification of isoparametric hypersurfaces in spheres with \((g,m)=(6,1)\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6552060

      Statements

      0 references
      8 March 2016
      0 references
      isoparametric hypersurface
      0 references
      homogeneous hypersurface
      0 references
      Classification of isoparametric hypersurfaces in spheres with \((g,m)=(6,1)\) (English)
      0 references
      The author studies isoparametric hypersurfaces in the sphere with 6 different eigenvalues, each of multiplicity 1. They obtain a complete classification of such hypersurfaces showing that they are indeed all homogeneous. This way she provides an alternative proof of the classical result of \textit{J. Dorfmeister} and \textit{E. Neher} [Commun. Algebra 13, 2299--2368 (1985; Zbl 0578.53041)].NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe key idea of the proof is to determine explicitly for which matrices \(L_1\), the curve \(\cos t L_0+ \sin t L_1\), where \(L_0\) is the diagonal matrix with entries \(\sqrt{3}\), \(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\), \(0\), \(-\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\), \(-\sqrt{3}\), is isospectral in \(\mathrm{Sym}(5,\mathbb R)\). It turns out that up to conjugation there are only 6 possibilities for the matrix \(L_1\). It is still an open problem whether there exists a similar result in order to deal with the multiplicity-2 case.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEFinally the author also points out some problems, illustrated with some counterexamples, related to the approach of Miyaoka for dealing with this problem.
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers