Profits and pitfalls of timescales in asymptotics (Q2808250)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Profits and pitfalls of timescales in asymptotics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6583605
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Profits and pitfalls of timescales in asymptotics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6583605 |
Statements
20 May 2016
0 references
multiscale methods
0 references
perturbation methods
0 references
averaging
0 references
renormalization
0 references
asymptotic expansions
0 references
small parameter
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
Profits and pitfalls of timescales in asymptotics (English)
0 references
Certain timescales, like \(t,\) \(\varepsilon t,\) \(\varepsilon^{2}t,\) \(\ldots,\) arise naturally in perturbation problems for ordinary differential equations involving a small positive parameter \(\varepsilon.\) Multiscale methods represent very useful tools of analysis and anticipation of time scales is helpful in many problems, but not always. This nice paper addresses both efficiency and inefficiency of this popular technique. After a careful analysis of several examples, two classes of problems, where multiple timing may not be efficients are indicated. It appears that averaging and renormalization perform better than multiscale methods and give correct results in bifurcation problems, where one has to use unexpected algebraic timescales and in problems with resonance manifolds where higher order algebraic timescales and asymptotically small domains are encountered.
0 references
0.7393249273300171
0 references
0.726163387298584
0 references
0.7216414213180542
0 references
0.7087463736534119
0 references