The topological complexity and the homotopy cofiber of the diagonal map for non-orientable surfaces (Q2821759)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6629341
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The topological complexity and the homotopy cofiber of the diagonal map for non-orientable surfaces
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6629341

      Statements

      The topological complexity and the homotopy cofiber of the diagonal map for non-orientable surfaces (English)
      0 references
      23 September 2016
      0 references
      Lusternik-Schnirelmann category
      0 references
      topological complexity
      0 references
      non-orientable surfaces
      0 references
      The topological complexity \(\mathrm {TC}(X)\) of a space \(X\) is a numerical homotopy invariant introduced by \textit{M. Farber} in [Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 No. 2, 211--221 (2003; Zbl 1038.68130)] in order to study the motion planning problem in Robotics from a topological perspective.NEWLINENEWLINEFarber computed, by using cohomological estimates, the topological complexity of several interesting spaces, including the orientable surfaces. However the used techniques were not applicable to non-orientable surfaces. Therefore this case was unsolved and left as an open problem.NEWLINENEWLINEIn the paper under review the author makes a big step towards solution of this problem by proving that the topological complexity of a non-orientable surface of genus \(g>4\) is NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\mathrm {TC}(N_g)=4.NEWLINE\]NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe author also deals with the comparison between the topological complexity \(\mathrm {TC}(N_g)\) and the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category \(\mathrm {cat}(C_{\Delta N_g})\) of the homotopy cofiber of the diagonal map \(\Delta :N_g\rightarrow N_g\times N_g.\) Actually, he proves that \(\mathrm {cat}(C_{\Delta N_g})=3\) for any genus \(g.\) Combining this result with \(\mathrm {TC}(N_g)=4\) for \(g>4\), a family of counterexamples to the general conjecture \(\mathrm {TC}(X)=\mathrm {cat}(C_{\Delta X}),\) first studied in [\textit{J. M. García Calcines} and \textit{L. Vandembroucq}, Math. Z. 274, No. 1--2, 145--165 (2013; Zbl 1275.55003)] and [\textit{A. Dranishnikov}, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142, No. 12, 4365--4376 (2014; Zbl 1305.55003)] is obtained.NEWLINENEWLINEThe author also presents a short illustrative counterexample to the conjecture above. Concretely, if \(K=K(H,1)\) denotes the classifying space for Higman's group \(H\), then it is shown that \(\mathrm {cat}(C_{\Delta K})=2\), in contrast with the already established computation \(\mathrm {TC}(K)=4\) in [\textit{M. Grant} et al., Topology Appl. 189, 78--91 (2015; Zbl 1317.55003)].
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references