Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting (Q2866756)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6238583
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6238583

      Statements

      Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      16 December 2013
      0 references
      ordered Banach spaces
      0 references
      \(C^{\ast}\)-algebra
      0 references
      noncommutative function space
      0 references
      domination problem
      0 references
      operator ideal
      0 references
      Suppose that \(E\) and \(F\) are ordered Banach spaces and \(S\) and \(T\) are operators in \(L(E,F)\) such that \(0\leq S\leq T.\) If \(T\) belongs to a certain ideal of operators \(\mathfrak{I}\), does this imply that \(S\) also belongs to \(\mathfrak{I}\)? The paper under review describes several non-commutative instances for which the answer is positive. These refer to the case where \(E\) and/or \(F\) are \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras, preduals of von Neumann algebras or non-commutative function spaces. For example, it is shown that when \(E\) and \(F\) are \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras, then the following two assertions are equivalent: (i) if \(0\leq S\leq T\) and \(T\) is compact, then \(S\) is compact, too; (ii) the spectrum of every self-adjoint element of \(E\) is countable, or every order interval \([0,x]\) of \(F\) is compact.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references