Higher Chow cycles on abelian surfaces and a non-Archimedean analogue of the Hodge-\(\mathcal{D}\)-conjecture (Q2877498)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6333827
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Higher Chow cycles on abelian surfaces and a non-Archimedean analogue of the Hodge-\(\mathcal{D}\)-conjecture
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6333827

      Statements

      0 references
      22 August 2014
      0 references
      higher Chow groups
      0 references
      rational curves
      0 references
      abelian surfaces
      0 references
      Higher Chow cycles on abelian surfaces and a non-Archimedean analogue of the Hodge-\(\mathcal{D}\)-conjecture (English)
      0 references
      Consider a simple, principally polarized, abelian surface \(A\) over a \(p\)-adic local field \(\mathcal K_p\). Let \(\mathcal A\) be the NΓ©ron model of \(A\) over \(\mathcal O_{{\mathcal K_p}}\) where \(p \neq 2\) is an odd prime of good non-supersingular reduction and let \(\mathcal A_p\) be the special fibre. Aim of the paper is the proof of the surjectivity of the boundary arrow \( \partial : \text{CH}^2(A,1)\otimes{\mathbb Q} {\rightarrow} \mathrm{CH}^1(\mathcal A_p) \otimes \mathbb Q\). Recall that the `Archimedean' Hodge-\(\mathcal D\)-conjecture of Beilinson asserts that the regulator map to Deligne cohomology is surjective. The author explains how \(\partial\) can be understood as a non-Archimedean analogue of the Beilinson regulator map and therefore he refers to his result as a proof of the \textit{non-Archimedean Hodge-\(\mathcal D\)-conjecture} in the present setting.NEWLINENEWLINETo prove surjectivity of \(\partial\) one needs to have geometrical control of the rank of the NΓ©ron-Severi group of the non singular surface \(\mathcal A_p\). This can be done concretely, by looking to the related Kummer surface and to the associated plane. Obstruction to the surjectivity could come only from unexpected, new classes in \(\mathrm{NS}(\mathcal A_p)\). The author shows that those cycles correspond to the union of two rational curves on the Kummer. Deformation theory of such couples is at the heart of the clever construction of the element in \(\mathrm{CH}^2(A,1)\) whose boundary gives back the new class one had started with.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references