Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results (Q2882796)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6031503
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6031503

      Statements

      0 references
      0 references
      7 May 2012
      0 references
      deflation
      0 references
      projector preconditioning
      0 references
      balancing
      0 references
      dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting
      0 references
      balancing domain decomposition by constraints
      0 references
      domain decomposition
      0 references
      iterative substructuring
      0 references
      incompressible elasticity problem
      0 references
      numerical results
      0 references
      linear elasticity
      0 references
      Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results (English)
      0 references
      Projector preconditioning, also known as the deflation method, as well as the balancing preconditioner are applied to the dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting (FETI-DP) and balancing domain decomposition by constraints (BDDC) methods in order to create a second, independent coarse problem. This may help to extend the parallel scalability of classical FETI-DP and BDDC methods without the use of inexact solvers and may also be used to improve the robustness, e.g., for almost incompressible elasticity problems. Connections of FETI-DP methods applying a transformation of basis using a larger coarse space with a corresponding FETI-DP method using projector preconditioning or balancing are pointed out. It is then shown that the methods have essentially the same spectrum. Numerical results for compressible and almost incompressible linear elasticity are provided. The sensitivity of the projection methods to an inexact computation of the projections is numerically investigated and a different behavior for projector preconditioning and the balancing preconditioner is found.
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references