A note on the vanishing of certain local cohomology modules (Q2888784)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A note on the vanishing of certain local cohomology modules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6042602
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | A note on the vanishing of certain local cohomology modules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6042602 |
Statements
4 June 2012
0 references
0.97245896
0 references
0.9621483
0 references
0.95471597
0 references
0.95179343
0 references
0.95179343
0 references
0.9509423
0 references
0.9459753
0 references
0.9457769
0 references
0.94368774
0 references
A note on the vanishing of certain local cohomology modules (English)
0 references
Let \((R,\mathfrak m)\) be a commutative noetherian local ring, \(\mathfrak a\) an ideal of \(R\) and \(M\) a finitely generated \(R\)-module. The author investigates the vanishing of the local cohomology modules NEWLINE\[NEWLINEH_{\mathfrak a}^i(M):={\varinjlim}_nExt^i_R(R/{\mathfrak{a}} ^n,M).NEWLINE\]NEWLINE It is known that \(H_{\mathfrak a}^i(M)=0\) for all \(i>\dim_RM\). On the other hand, Grothendieck's non-vanishing theorem asserts that \(H_{\mathfrak m}^{\dim_RM}(M) \neq 0\). When \(R\) contains a field, the author gives an easy proof of Grothendieck's non-vanishing theorem.NEWLINENEWLINENext, assume that \((R,\mathfrak m)\) is a complete local domain contains a field \(k\) and \(x_1,x_2,\dots ,x_n\in R\). Let \(Q(R)\) denote the quotient field of the domain \(R_0:=k[[x_1,x_2,\dots ,x_n]]\). The author shows that if \(H_{(x_1,x_2,\dots ,x_n)} ^n(R)\neq 0\), then \(\dim R_0=n\) and \(R\cap Q(R_0)=R_0\).
0 references