Separating bounded arithmetical theories by Herbrand consistency (Q2893322)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6048167
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Separating bounded arithmetical theories by Herbrand consistency
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6048167

      Statements

      Separating bounded arithmetical theories by Herbrand consistency (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      20 June 2012
      0 references
      bounded arithmetics
      0 references
      Herbrand consistency
      0 references
      \(\Pi _{1}\)-conservative extensions
      0 references
      The paper is devoted to the problem of \(\Pi_{1}\)-separating the hierarchy of bounded arithmetic. It is shown that the notion of Herbrand consistency in its full generality cannot \(\Pi_{1}\)-separate the theory \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0} + \bigwedge_{j} \Omega_{j}\) from \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0}\), though it can \(\Pi_{1}\)-separate \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0} + \mathrm{Exp}\) from \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0}\). In fact it is proved that Herbrand consistency of \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0}\) cannot be proved in the theory \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0} + \bigwedge_{j} \Omega_{j}\). The result partially extends a result of L. A. Kołodziejczyk, who showed that for a finite fragment \(S \subseteq \mathrm{I}\Delta_{0}\) the Herbrand consistency of \(S + \Omega_{1}\) is not provable in \(\mathrm{I}\Delta_{0} + \bigwedge_{j} \Omega_{j}\).
      0 references

      Identifiers