An explicit basis of modular symbols on function fields (Q305154)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An explicit basis of modular symbols on function fields
scientific article

    Statements

    An explicit basis of modular symbols on function fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 August 2016
    0 references
    Let \(\mathbb F_q\) be the finite field with \(q\) elements, \(A = \mathbb F_q[T]\) and \(K = \mathbb F_q(T)\) the polynomial ring and field of rational functions in \(\mathbb F_q\), respectively, with completion \(K_{\infty} = \mathbb F_q((1/T))\). Let \(\mathfrak n\) be a non-trivial ideal of \(A\) and \(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n)\) the Hecke congruence subgroup of \(\Gamma =\mathrm{GL}_2(A)\) with conductor \(\mathfrak n\). The group \(\Gamma\) and thus \(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n)\) acts simplicially on \(\mathcal T\), the Bruhat-Tits tree of \(\mathrm{GL}_2(K_{\infty})\). These data are related to the Drinfeld modular curve \(X_o(\mathfrak n)\) and its arithmetic. In particular, for any commutative ring \(R\) (\(R = \mathbb Z\), \(\mathbb Z[1/q]\), \(\mathbb Q\), \(\mathbb C\), \dots) let \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak n}(R)\) be the group of \(R\)-valued modular symbols of \(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n)\) as defined by \textit{J. T. Teitelbaum} [Duke Math. J. 68, No. 2, 271--295 (1992; Zbl 0777.11021)]: \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak n}(R)=H_0(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n),M\otimes_{\mathbb Z} R)\), where \(M = \mathbb Z[\mathbb P^1(K)]^0\), the free abelian group of divisors of degree 0 on the projective line \(\mathbb P^1(K) = \mathbb P^1(A)\). As shown by Teitelbaum, \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak n}(\mathbb Z)\) is the quotient of \(\mathbb Z[\mathbb P^1(A/\mathfrak n)]\) modulo the three families of relations {\parindent=0.7cm\begin{itemize}\item[(1.1)] \((u:v)+(-v:u) = 0\); \item[(1.2)] \((u:v)+(v:-u-v)+(-u-v:u) = 0\); \item[(1.3)] \((u':v)-(\delta_1u:\delta_2v)=0\), \end{itemize}} where \(\delta_1,\delta_2 \in \mathbb F_q^{\ast}\), \((u:v) \in \mathbb P^1(A/\mathfrak n)\). It is known that \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak n}\) is related with the homology of \(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n)\setminus \mathcal T\) (Prop. 4.1, [loc. cit.]) and with the group \(\mathbf H_{\mathfrak n}\) of harmonic cochains on \(\Gamma_0(\mathfrak n) \setminus \mathcal T\) (Theorem 4.2, Lemma 4.4, [loc. cit.], [the reviewer and \textit{U. Nonnengardt}, Int. J. Math. 6, No. 5, 689--708 (1995; Zbl 0858.11025)]). In particular, the torsion \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak n}\) is trivial (cyclic of order \(q+1\)) if \(\mathfrak n\) is prime of odd (even) degree. Suppose from now on that \(\mathfrak n = \mathfrak p\) is prime of degree \(d\). The principal result of this well-written paper is Theorem 1.1, which specifies a natural basis of \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak p}\) in case \(d\) is odd. A more detailed version, valid for arbitrary \(d\), is given in Proposition 5.13 and Theorem 5.16, which describe a direct decomposition of \(\mathbf M_{\mathfrak p}\) according to degree of generators of \(\mathbb Z[\mathbb P^1(A/\mathfrak p)]\) and bases of the respective pieces. Other important results are Theorem 1.2 (a special case of Theorem 7.10), giving the linear independence of certain Hecke images of the ``winding element'' \(\mathbf e \in \mathbf M_{\mathfrak p}(\mathbb Z)\) and Theorem 1.3, which establishes a lower bound for the number of newforms \(F \in \mathbf H_{\mathfrak n}\) whose \(L\)-series \(L(F,x)\) does not vanish at the critical point \(s=1\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    modular symbols
    0 references
    Drinfeld modules
    0 references
    \(L\)-functions
    0 references
    automorphic cusp forms
    0 references
    0 references