Stablity of Set-Valued Mappings In Infinite Dimensions: Point Criteria and Applications (Q3128461)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1000478
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Stablity of Set-Valued Mappings In Infinite Dimensions: Point Criteria and Applications
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1000478

      Statements

      Stablity of Set-Valued Mappings In Infinite Dimensions: Point Criteria and Applications (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      18 August 1998
      0 references
      set-valued mappings
      0 references
      Asplund spaces
      0 references
      point criteria
      0 references
      neighbourhood criteria
      0 references
      metric regularity
      0 references
      Lipschitzian stability
      0 references
      sensitivity analysis
      0 references
      infinite-dimensional constraint systems
      0 references
      parametric variational inequalities
      0 references
      Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be Asplund spaces, and let \(\Phi\) be a subset of the product \(X\times Y\). Use the notation \[ \Phi(x) = \left\{ y\in Y \colon (x,y)\in\Phi \right\} \] to view \(\Phi\) as the graph of a set-valued mapping. The main result in this paper establishes conditions under which the following assumption implies that this mapping has desirable covering properties near a point \((\overline x,\overline y)\) in \(\Phi\): \[ N(\overline x,\overline y;\Phi) \cap \left[\{0\}\times Y^*\right] = \{(0,0)\}. \tag \(*\) \] Here \(N(z;K)\) denotes the well-known sequential normal cone to the set \(K\) at the point \(z\in K\), whose construction and history are outlined in the paper. Condition \((*)\) underlies the title's emphasis on point criteria: in contrast with the neighbourhood criteria used by earlier authors, in which the properties of all sets \(N(x,y;\Phi)\) for \((x,y)\) in \(\Phi\) near \((\overline x,\overline y)\) came into consideration, the current work concentrates the entire burden of sufficiency exactly on the point of interest. The success of this program relies on working in Asplund spaces instead of general Banach spaces, and on augmenting \((*)\) with a suitable compactness hypothesis. This condition, ``partial normal compactness'', is introduced in this paper, and used to obtain the strongest conclusions. Assuming all the hypotheses listed above, the paper's main result asserts that \((*)\) implies that there exist neighbourhoods \(U\) of \(\overline x\) and \(V\) of \(\overline y\), together with a ``covering constant'' \(a>0\) such that \[ \Phi(x+rB) \supseteq \Phi(x)\cap V + a r B \] whenever \(x\) in \(X\) and \(r>0\) are such that \(x+rB \subseteq U\). (Here \(B\) denotes the closed unit ball in the Banach space defined by the context.) This result has immediate consequences for metric regularity and Lipschitzian stability. The authors describe these, and also discuss applications to the sensitivity analysis of infinite-dimensional constraint systems and parametric variational inequalities.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references