Deformation rigidity of the 20-dimensional \(F_4\)-homogeneous space associated to a short root (Q3159955)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131816
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Deformation rigidity of the 20-dimensional \(F_4\)-homogeneous space associated to a short root
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131816

      Statements

      0 references
      0 references
      1 February 2005
      0 references
      simple complex Lie group
      0 references
      maximal parabolic subgroup
      0 references
      rational homogeneous space
      0 references
      short root
      0 references
      projective morphism
      0 references
      Deformation rigidity of the 20-dimensional \(F_4\)-homogeneous space associated to a short root (English)
      0 references
      Let \(G\) be a complex simple Lie group and \(P\) a maximal parabolic subgroup; recall that the quotient \(G/P\) is a rational homogeneous space of Picard number~1. The~authors work on the following conjecture: \textsl{Let \(\pi\) be a smooth projective morphism from a complex manifold \(X\) to the unit disc, and assume that for each \(t\neq0\) the fiber \(\pi^{-1}(t)\) is biholomorphic to~\(G/P\). Then \(\pi^{-1}(0)\) is also biholomorphic to~\(G/P\).} If~we denote by \(\mathfrak g\) the Lie algebra of \(G\) and by \(\alpha\) the simple root determining~\(P\), then in the previous papers by the authors [Invent. Math. 131, No. 2, 393--418 (1998; Zbl 0902.32014); J. Reine Angew. Math. 486, 153--163 (1997; Zbl 0876.53030); Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér. 35, No. 2, 173--184 (2002; Zbl 1008.32012)], the above conjecture was proved for all rational homogeneous spaces of Picard number~1 except for the following three cases: (1)~type \((C_l,\alpha)\), where \(\alpha\) is a short root; (2)~type \((F_4,\alpha_1)\); (3)~type \((F_4,\alpha_2)\). The~purpose of the paper under review is to settle the case~(3), i.e.~of \((F_4,\alpha_2)\). The~main difference against the proofs in the three papers mentioned above is that now the structure of the relevant symbol algebra cannot be recovered from the Serre presentation of the simple Lie algebra, but has to be gleaned directly from the projective geometry of the variety of minimal rational tangents. For~this reason, a~large portion of the paper is devoted to a study of this variety, which is of independent interest. For the entire collection see [Zbl 1051.14003].
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references