Comparing the degrees of unconstrained and shape preserving approximation by polynomials (Q320327)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6633948
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Comparing the degrees of unconstrained and shape preserving approximation by polynomials
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6633948

      Statements

      Comparing the degrees of unconstrained and shape preserving approximation by polynomials (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      6 October 2016
      0 references
      0 references
      comonotone and coconvex approximation by polynomials
      0 references
      degree of approximation
      0 references
      Jackson-type estimates
      0 references
      We denote by \(\mathbb{Y}_{s}\) the set of all collections \(Y_{s} = \{ y_{i} \}_{i=1}^{s},\) where \(y_{s+1} := -1 < y_{s} < \dots < y_{1} < 1 =: y_{0}\) and \( s \geq 1\) is given. By definition, \(f \in \Delta^{(1)}(Y_{s})\) if \( f \in C[-1,1]\) and \((-1)^{i}f\) is nondecreasing on \([y_{i+1}, y_{i}],\) \(i=0,1,\dots , s,\) and \(f \in \Delta^{(2)}(Y_{s})\) if \( f \in C[-1,1]\) and \((-1)^{i}f\) is convex on \([y_{i+1}, y_{i}],\) \(i=0,1,\dots , s,\) respectively. For \(f \in C[-1,1],\) we denote by \(E_{n}(f) := \inf_{p_{n} \in \mathbb{P}_{n}} \, \| f - p_{n} \|\) the degree of approximation of \(f\) by algebraic polynomials of degree \(< n\) (\(\mathbb{P}_{n}\) is the space of all algebraic polynomials of degree \(<n,\) and \(\| \cdot \|\) is the uniform norm on \(C[-1,1]\)). Further, for \(f \in \Delta^{(q)}(Y_{s}),\) \(q = 1, 2,\) we denote by \(E_{n}^{(q)}(f,Y_{s}) := \inf_{P_{n} \in \mathbb{P}_{n} \cap \Delta^{(q)}(Y_{s})} \, \| f - P_{n} \|\) the degree of best comonotone, respectively, coconvex approximation of \(f\) relative to \(Y_{s}.\)NEWLINENEWLINEThe authors prove the following results, which answer some former open questions.NEWLINENEWLINETheorem 1. If \(Y_{s} \in \mathbb{Y}_{s},\) \(s \geq 2,\) and \(1 < \alpha \leq 2,\) then there exist the constants \(c(\alpha, s)\) and \(N^{*}(\alpha, Y_{s})\) such that for the all functions \(f \in \Delta^{(1)}(Y_{s})\) we have \(n^{\alpha} E_{n}(f) \leq 1\) for \(n \geq s+2\) and \(n^{\alpha} E_{n}^{(1)}(f,Y_{s}) \leq c(\alpha, s)\) for \(n \geq N^{*}(\alpha, Y_{s}),\) respectively.NEWLINENEWLINETheorem 2. Given \(Y_{s} \in \mathbb{Y}_{s},\) \(s \geq 3,\) and \(2 < \alpha < 4.\) Then there exist the constants \(c(\alpha, s)\) and \(N^{*}(\alpha, Y_{s})\) such that the all functions \(f \in \Delta^{(2)}(Y_{s})\) satisfy that \(n^{\alpha} E_{n}(f) \leq 1\) for \(n \geq s+3\) and \(n^{\alpha} E_{n}^{(2)}(f,Y_{s}) \leq c(\alpha, s)\) for \(n \geq N^{*}(\alpha, Y_{s}).\)
      0 references

      Identifiers