Singular equivariant asymptotics and the momentum map. Residue formulae in equivariant cohomology (Q326640)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Singular equivariant asymptotics and the momentum map. Residue formulae in equivariant cohomology
scientific article

    Statements

    Singular equivariant asymptotics and the momentum map. Residue formulae in equivariant cohomology (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    12 October 2016
    0 references
    Let \(\mathbf{X}\) be a symplectic manifold, \(G\) the Lie group acting on \(M\) as Hamiltonian action. Let \(\mathbb{J}:\mathbf{X}\to \mathfrak{g}^\ast\), where \(\mathfrak{g}\) is the Lie algebra of \(G\), be the corresponding momentum map. If \(\mathbf{X}\) is compact and 0 a regular value of \(\mathbb{J}\), then the cohomology of the Marsden-Weinstein reduced space \(\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}}=\mathbb{J}^{-1}(0)/G\) was expressed in terms of the equivariant cohomology of \(\mathbf{X}\) via a certain residue formula [\textit{L. C. Jeffrey} and \textit{F. C. Kirwan}, Topology 34, No. 2, 291--327 (1995; Zbl 0833.55009)]. The residue formula when 0 is not a regular value is also derived if \(\mathbf{X}\) is a nonsingular projective variety [\textit{L. C. Jeffrey} et al., Transform. Groups 8, No. 3, 217--259 (2003; Zbl 1080.14537)]. In this paper, as an extension of these results, a residue formula in the case \(\mathbf{X}=T^\ast M\), \(M\) a Riemannian manifold and \(G\) acts as isometries, is proved via desingularization of \(\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}}\) at 0 (\S10, Theorem 7). For this purpose, the equivariant cohomology \(H_G^\ast(\mathbf{X})\) and cohomology of \(\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}}\) are related by a Duistermaat-Heckman type integral [\textit{J. J. Duistermaat} and \textit{G. J. Heckman}, Invent. Math. 69, 259--268 (1982; Zbl 0503.58015)] \[ X\to L_\alpha(X)=\int_{\mathbf X}e^{iJX}\alpha, \, X\in\mathfrak{g}, \, \alpha\in\Lambda(\mathbf{X}), \] where \(J\) is the almost complex structure of \(\mathbf{X}\) compatible with the symplectic structure. Applying the localization formula in equivariant cohomology (\S2, Theorem 1. [\textit{N. Berline} et al., Heat kernels and Dirac operators. Berlin etc.: Springer-Verlag (1992; Zbl 0744.58001)], Theorem 7.13), it is shown that \[ L_{e^{-i\omega}\rho(Y)}=\sum_{F\in\mathcal{F}}u_F(Y). \] Here, \(\mathcal{F}\) is a connected components of fixed points of a \(T\)-action, where \(T\) is a fixed maximal torus of \(G\) (\S2, Corollary 2. The explicit form of \(u_F\) is given as (5)). Let \(\Phi(Y)=\prod_{\gamma\in\Delta_+}\gamma(Y)\), \(\Delta_+\) be the set of positive roots, and set \[ \mathcal{F}_t(u_F\Phi^k)=U_F^{\Phi^k}, \] where \(\mathcal{F}\) is the (\(\mathfrak{g}\)-)Fourier transform. The residue treated in this paper is defined by \[ \mathrm{Res}^{\Lambda,\zeta}(u_F\Phi^k)=\lim_{t\to 0}U^{\Phi^k}_F(t\zeta), \] (\S2, Definition 1). Then it is shown that to understand the residue, it is necessary to study the asymptotic behavior of \[ I_\zeta(\mu)=\int_{\mathfrak g}\int_{\mathbf X}e^{i\psi_\zeta(\eta,X)/\mu}a(\eta,X)d\eta d\mathbf{X}. \] Here, \(\psi_\zeta(\eta,X)=\mathbb{J}(\eta)(X)-\zeta(X), \zeta\in\mathfrak{g}^\ast\). If the critical set of the phase function is smooth, the asymptotic behavior of \(I_\zeta\) is computed by the stationary phase theorem (\S3, Theorem A. Proved in Appendix A, cf. [\textit{M. Combescure} et al., Commun. Math. Phys. 202, No. 2, 463--480 (1999; Zbl 0939.58031)]). To get the asymptotic expansion of \(I_\zeta\), a desingularization of the critical set is performed following [\textit{K. Kawakubo}, The theory of transformation groups. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press (1991; Zbl 0744.57001)]. It is also shown that a repeating use of the stationary phase method is allowed. These are the main parts of the paper. After these preparations, \[ I(\mu)=(2\pi\mu)^\kappa L_0+O(\mu^{k+1}(\log\mu)^{\Lambda-1}) \] is shown with an explicit form of the leading coefficient \(L_0\) (\S9. Theorem 6. The explicit form of \(L_0\) is given as (56)). The author says that Theorem 6 is the main theorem of the paper. Let \(\tilde{\mathcal{K}}:\Lambda^{\ast+\kappa}(T^\ast M)\to\Lambda^{\ast-d}(\mathrm{Reg}\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}})\) be the composition of the maps \[ \begin{aligned} \frac{r}{\mathrm{vol}\mathcal{O}}:\lambda^{\ast+\kappa}(T^\ast M)\to \Lambda^\ast(\mathrm{Reg}\mathbb{J}^{-1}(0)), \\ \pi_\ast:\Lambda^\ast(\mathrm{Reg}\mathbb{J}^{-1}(0))\to \Lambda^{\ast-d}(\mathrm{Reg}\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}}).\end{aligned} \] Let \(\rho\in H^\ast_G(T^\ast M)\) be \(\rho(X)=\alpha+D\nu(X)\), where \(\alpha\) is a closed basic differential form on \(T^\ast M\) of compact support and \(\nu\) an equivariant differential form of compact support, and the dimension of a principal \(G\)-orbit is \(d=\dim\mathfrak{g}\). Then from Theorem 6, \[ (2\pi)^d\int_{\mathrm{Reg}\mathbf{X}_{\mathrm{red}}}\tilde{\mathcal{K}}(e^{-i\bar{\omega}}\alpha)=\frac{|H|}{|W|\mathrm{vol} T}\mathrm{Res}\bigl(\Phi^2\sum_{F\in\mathcal{F}}u_F\bigr), \] is derived (\S10. Theorem 7). Here, \(W\) is the Weyl group and \(H\) is the principal isotropy group of the \(G\)-action. This is the final result of the paper. The author remarks that the assumption on \(\rho\) is not so restrictive, because if \(G\) acts locally freely, then \(H_G^\ast(\mathbf{X})\cong H^\ast(\mathbf{X}/G)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    equivariant cohomology
    0 references
    residue formulae
    0 references
    momentum map
    0 references
    symplectic quotient
    0 references
    Marsden-Weinstein reduced space
    0 references
    stationary phase principle
    0 references
    resolution of singularities
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references